[Json] [Errata Rejected] RFC8259 (6208)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 10 June 2020 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14AA3A08FA; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dDNRk9ERD4XP; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236AF3A08EF; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 98151F40716; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: xdg@xdg.me, tbray@textuality.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, json@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20200610143837.98151F40716@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/1vrfv_bQGic8jnOM_PCXy56SSLs>
Subject: [Json] [Errata Rejected] RFC8259 (6208)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:39:05 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8259,
"The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6208

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: David Golden <xdg@xdg.me>
Date Reported: 2020-06-10
Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: 8.1

Original Text
-------------
In the interests of interoperability, implementations that parse JSON texts MAY ignore the presence of a byte order mark rather than treating it as an error.

Corrected Text
--------------
In the interests of interoperability, implementations that parse JSON texts MAY ignore the presence of a byte order mark or MAY interpret a byte order mark to indicate an alternate encoding rather than treating it as an error.

Notes
-----
The original line is copied from previous RFCs that specifically allowed alternate encodings.  In the context of a new, UTF-8 only restriction, interoperability provisions should also address interpreting legacy formats that predate the restriction.  By omission, readers may conclude that the *only* option for a BOM is to ignore or error.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
   This is asking to revisit what we have consensus on, not a report of an error in the RFC.
The working group had extensive discussions on BOMs, and chose this particular working purposefully.

--------------------------------------
RFC8259 (draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format
Publication Date    : December 2017
Author(s)           : T. Bray, Ed.
Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
Source              : Javascript Object Notation Update
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG