Re: [Json] Counterproposal #2 on work items

Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0116421F8DEE for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:46:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id crJZS2Q9-mB4 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:46:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4232021F8DED for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:46:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so7147512wgi.27 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:46:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UVR9TBFPfJBO7MG+KsKi4qoTOrVfErQp5FCT0bp3SzI=; b=FD9z7IfJlM4vmzu8Zodjd+T+hdd+mQcEBqdnxWBL2m62m817/BzOVf3jsfMKAOPUIC mHHuzuyOyhPNN84sNeUvLjqLxlBXd6sExnwxAB5Ep1Ql0fHgZQxLOFUZYbupGrOzenFJ DRi/bg7NgPBR0Ne5HXwFaXvGRv6q0rx72PsRIgAty5qYOXRYH+DRQc/1KlfyQ51gVlZt RqjKdCHQ/MuEABfdxms/Jtt10dKe+pTnN3UMNbVdrJMyAsCwhbaKsXqpdb+HR2GWqh6j EFMa/oohqQ72Z0MPlFPiyBPSMVhdVqTdX9jf/Kx1+os+DErNf67qN76Nlac1qMM6oVDh R1Hw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.5.196 with SMTP id u4mr33803416wju.47.1361429177387; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.138.170 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:46:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6ivWtUrJ9nu2XBr7ffTkxoge=AB9gME-n3F2fp6fJfBrXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALcybBC87P7FT7n5d8xmXMxSFU1LBS9eJUsRX4hfYP5CUJr3QA@mail.gmail.com> <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F89B751@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CALcybBBSL3w1-JRzUVWMmfS+jzytKNOv6omD1cR+_CLjze6WsA@mail.gmail.com> <12CE5BFB-49C5-48D0-96DF-F78F0D60578A@yahoo.com> <CALcybBCJ=z6u=1CGURB4ECoOaOA1igDy0H64fRm5Sj1HWQcRCg@mail.gmail.com> <1361419333.51990.YahooMailNeo@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4E2B71678D46B212D1553AD2@cyrus.local> <CAChr6Syimm2whKGVD2rtXimV5k59_wO8_=9EQ4fOWF=BRCUroA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6ivWtUrJ9nu2XBr7ffTkxoge=AB9gME-n3F2fp6fJfBrXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:46:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Syay=cA_99SCaisyF9jHZ4XBgvngnSPFC=xUz+wCA0-SQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>, Vinny A <jsontest@yahoo.com>, "Joe Hildebrand \(jhildebr\)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Counterproposal #2 on work items
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:46:19 -0000

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
> Which was why I was interested in a best-practices spec.

I agree that such a document would be the right place to address the
duplicate-key issue.

- Rob