IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 03 October 2013 04:22 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C878511E80D3 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pNgA6iYUAD5e for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 21:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE99721F9E02 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 21:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id r934M2BK011438; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:22:02 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 091a_7349_5a795d80_2be3_11e3_b87b_001e6722eec2; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:22:02 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [133.2.210.1]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199BABF4E2; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:22:02 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <524CF0DC.8080701@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:21:48 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF1BB0B@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAChr6SyznBktmOLpT-EiZ5Nm_0jZ16M0tOo4aZ_jhSDb=HHDqg@mail.gmail.com> <23C96FBA-3419-4C97-A075-462F7443013A@vpnc.org> <CAHBU6is2WzCNCwa0PYMM1Hr3Lij0GxWkVtVUan9=JPbvv0YCZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw72kxm8qJiDu=XMnARCttQPc5GNRQaXz4Xw9y+6-3=Mg@mail.gmail.com> <421F79DF-0B88-4E24-8666-189228E6E189@vpnc.org> <CAChr6SyEBkhbB5Mrr1AAqevzouvSa7Cx+qtvBx=HPCdgAiQjOg@mail.gmail.com> <20131002204435.GG30371@mercury.ccil.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131002204435.GG30371@mercury.ccil.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 04:22:43 -0000

On 2013/10/03 5:44, John Cowan wrote:
> R S scripsit:
>
>> I think we pretty clearly need to refer to 5.1 to do the comparison. We
>> can leave the old reference for the "derived from" text if we want.
>
> +1 on both points:  JSON is derived from the 3rd edition, but should be
> compared to the 5.1th (5.1st?) edition.

Edition 5.1, hopefully.

Regards,   Martin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email