Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02

"Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com> Tue, 19 July 2016 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44B412DE32; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 02:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wW1GI7DVHZyp; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 02:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5540412DDA3; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 02:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2567; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1468919106; x=1470128706; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Zp8q63s4YcwKvfKMWpB5toKV6V8BWK0HUZyv3+62svk=; b=g/Z/1l5My6c3YIPskqXJjY7fhlY7wtTQCqf6LNn6MNLXUMqgQt8qqVd+ K7jevm5aJCiKXsm0gjTtXyNsyR70UZj7Nk3tQbEYxwYVJh7CcGbByqH4m Fm7yXeCLOFkbYQjrkqJTbDgxl9MRXdrfw2/hX40EghyeuIvdSW21pd8oo w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BVAgCj7I1X/4sNJK1bgz9WfAasRYwagXoihXgCgTE4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RcAQEEAQEBbAsFCwIBCBguIQYLFBECBA4FDogIAw8IDrkBDYQeAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDgkFiCKCVYJDhSmCLwWYcDICAYM2gW6HH4IegWuEWYhziCWHeAEeNoNzbocRfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,388,1464652800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="130995447"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Jul 2016 09:05:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6J955rI001056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:05:05 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 04:05:04 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 04:05:04 -0500
From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02
Thread-Index: AQHR4PQlBP0nI4w5ckS1LEOAPpaFO6AeidAAgAFBXIA=
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:05:04 +0000
Message-ID: <1620D9D0-1C06-46A7-AA46-267C41F261DA@cisco.com>
References: <CDD4C92E-863F-40FE-8D58-D764C9533FAA@cisco.com> <1e137fbf-6d67-d9b4-acbf-b53291c7bd40@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1e137fbf-6d67-d9b4-acbf-b53291c7bd40@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-pgp-agent: GPGMail
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.12.61]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_94224125-1F7E-4CFE-ADE2-88AC27202A1C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/2gl7eLm_9SZzQlcMyQO_FxSc5mY>
Cc: "draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:06:54 -0000

> On Jul 18, 2016, at 15:54, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> My understanding is that ECMA 404 is about to undergo a change, and this
> change is important to the changes in rfc7159bis.  If this is the case, then I
> believe that rfc7159bis should not have gone to last call, as one of the
> document's normative references is in flux and there is no pointer in the
> document to even a draft of the new version of the normative document.
> 
> Ideally rfc7159bis should not go to last call until there is the equivalent of
> a last call version of the revised ECMA 404.
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
> 

The only change planned for ECMA-404 is to reference rfc7159bis by its stable number.  One of them needs to go first; in this case that is rfc7159bis.


--
- m&m

Matt Miller
Cisco Systems, Inc.



> 
> 
> On 07/18/2016 05:58 AM, Matt Miller (mamille2) wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> This starts the Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02, ending on July 31.
>> 
>> Please send all comments to this list (json@ietf.org) or the draft author/editor (draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org).  Any and all comments are welcome, including simple statements that this document is ready to progress.
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> - JSONbis Chair
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> json mailing list
>> json@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>>