Re: [Json] Proposal: the minimal edit

R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 25 June 2013 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB32211E80D1 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WZb6NQN+UWkG for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0B411E80CC for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a12so8851581wgh.4 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9i/kwCEFZAfjmMVdHzn8rlFzOm0p6vTjQzASPXCDDwk=; b=egkVe8Ou09ZloFwqbudMIG9GAraukYieGcr+tTDw5wKOBjY6GdLl3L1jWld4qBtbcy zSDfQqR1MZesCWPqCrnbwUB7lj+Gket7LYUya7oEvE/57HrnTjIbB9rk//fHn01s2wKU eqxJuqN1eyONJ2Z1vxGc+a0564QDMeY78AuIx1dpFaF2/32JC0YCcsO7OSGvp43MuWDB T06tsO0be+H0D37+nYRqWnBsF7EI1e7rlzCo3m7mkm8pVcSUCKB97RWeIprGQikTf9ia gPtVXXn9iDmeqAwmo4+xKTWAqtqppFj9AyEVWB5QHYPM20nlp1t9eBkUHBJxF/iB1IPC FsKw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.76.103 with SMTP id j7mr8170815wiw.21.1372142201212; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.44.138 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CFD38719-3EB9-448C-A712-9B0E0B592D30@tzi.org>
References: <20130625032014.GF14060@mercury.ccil.org> <ECAD5568-05F1-44C0-A8E1-6A38DAFAF6D4@vpnc.org> <C75D5BC5-6D5F-4CC0-8ACA-9717E7607DE4@tzi.org> <CAHBU6itPYpcof20YOAhgT82VnMAfgtpH2TaSDX+OHpu__WYjGg@mail.gmail.com> <CFD38719-3EB9-448C-A712-9B0E0B592D30@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:36:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxF694dJJx0DfgZMVCCApJiLreDoqjPTc7yWrTeDOLcUA@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c7cc67c164c04dff4c0bc"
Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposal: the minimal edit
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:36:42 -0000

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

>
> There is another community that believes JSON is a format proprietary to
> JavaScript, so whatever is common (even if bad) practice in the JavaScript
> world needs to be within the JSON envelope.  Of course, if you believe
> that, you will grasp for straws like this "contradiction".
> That clash of communities is why we even have the discussion here.


First, I'll note that you seem to be saying something quite different from
John and Norbert (I think).

Second, I think the disagreement you've highlighted is real, although think
it's phrased very helpfully. The crux of the matter is that the JavaScript
implementations will not change, and they are material to the success of
JSON and this Working Group, so they need to be documented.

- Rob