Re: [Json] Proposed minimal change for duplicate names in objects

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sun, 07 July 2013 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A3521F9346 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UZ+YYEAoBOdB for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.pacifier.net (smtp2.pacifier.net [64.255.237.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E96621F8BB7 for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Philemon (mail.augustcellars.com [50.34.17.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp2.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 888C12CA09; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: "'John Cowan'" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "'Pete Resnick'" <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <B86E1D4B-1DC8-4AD6-B8B3-E989599E0537@vpnc.org> <CAK3OfOj3MNNhjwo2bMa5CgoqynzMRVvviBXC8szxt5D17Z7FDg@mail.gmail.com> <51D3C63C.5030703@cisco.com> <51D48023.1020008@qti.qualcomm.com> <20130703201143.GL32044@mercury.ccil.org> <00cd01ce7a9f$19adeaa0$4d09bfe0$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <00cd01ce7a9f$19adeaa0$4d09bfe0$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:13:22 -0700
Message-ID: <00d701ce7aa6$cc5fe700$651fb500$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJvUTXGqIW3iuu0l9rzv3fxldJ4PQL8G24kAqTixrQBjIQJ6gH4Oee+ATLeuAaXw+X7wA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'Nico Williams' <nico@cryptonector.com>, 'Paul Hoffman' <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, 'Eliot Lear' <lear@cisco.com>, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed minimal change for duplicate names in objects
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 00:14:30 -0000

Further clarification (on request)

Tim is not the only person saying this.  The JOSE working group has this as
a requirement to be enforced in the documents it is producing.
Specification that JOSE objects MUST fail validation if there are duplicate
names in an object.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: json-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:json-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Jim Schaad
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 4:18 PM
> To: 'John Cowan'; 'Pete Resnick'
> Cc: 'Nico Williams'; 'Paul Hoffman'; 'Eliot Lear'; json@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed minimal change for duplicate names in objects
> 
> And the JOSE working group.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: json-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:json-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of John Cowan
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 1:12 PM
> > To: Pete Resnick
> > Cc: Nico Williams; Paul Hoffman; Eliot Lear; json@ietf.org WG
> > Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed minimal change for duplicate names in
> > objects
> >
> > Pete Resnick scripsit:
> >
> > > So I don't think saying RECOMMENDED or SHOULD regarding not
> > producing
> > > duplicates should be seen as a non-starter. That's a defensible
> > > position for the WG to take.
> >
> > +1.  The only person saying otherwise right now is Tim, and he grants
> > that he is only concerned with a single use case.
> >
> > --
> > Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.
> >         --Arthur C. Clarke, "The Nine Billion Names of God"
> >                 John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
> > _______________________________________________
> > json mailing list
> > json@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
> 
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json