Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (3922)

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 26 March 2014 04:50 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B331A00C5 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FbDF47l7sHZq for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79401A00CB for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1395809414; x=1427345414; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wdsd8KCYD26M8wjMBn9XPlZyx8I7/K8sDfoBN0tlKL8=; b=rsTyRXlIkO1WdtRtPzqsgDiLiSFQpPfBAyhEx4BC/JNT/pofKcWozNog XFIk3PJm51k6Dtr1OYbb5dcaMShYE17JNq8xtqL3TAmqPeVU536ZAUwmi WxGrqXXIf7P4HYmCvKovBL6dSIFLqR0GI98iNa0Esnkabk7VLSGEQGlrc Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7388"; a="115603521"
Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2014 21:50:13 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,733,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="615101404"
Received: from nasanexhc07.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.190]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Mar 2014 21:50:10 -0700
Received: from resnick2.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:50:06 -0700
Message-ID: <53325C7C.7070400@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:50:04 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_J=2E_D=FCrst=22?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <20140319192235.B26B67FC394@rfc-editor.org> <0B49E8C8-3E47-48D8-B45A-D4948DCCE002@vpnc.org> <CALaySJJ85Q4bAbWDjZ1bOyhsHkP9pvN=TvYaHxoGBSMHnOKrUg@mail.gmail.com> <532A4493.3030804@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <532A4493.3030804@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/4RguOoB20_8X4Orn3U3uk6aL02M
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, "naesten@gmail.com" <naesten@gmail.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "mamille2@cisco.com" <mamille2@cisco.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (3922)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:50:18 -0000

And if one does, we will similarly remove it.

RFC Editor: Please remove erratum 3922.

pr

On 3/19/14 8:29 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> I think it's better as rejected, otherwise, there's a higher chance of 
> a similar one popping up in the future.
>
> Regards,    Martin.
>
> On 2014/03/20 05:23, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> I'd sat this shouldn't be marked "Rejected", but should instead be 
>> removed
>> from the errata system.  What does the RFC Editor think?
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please reject this errata report. There was a conscious decision 
>>> made by
>>> the RFC Editor to issue the new RFC; the fact that the reporter doesn't
>>> like that decision does not warrant an errata.
>>>
>>> --Paul Hoffman, JSON WG co-chair
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> json mailing list
>> json@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>>

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478