Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02

Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Mon, 18 July 2016 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766EA12DA5B; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HdXeal77H0-d; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 616C912DB8C; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id f65so107673719wmi.0; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lOV4zib5kyI/PG0VeFtV8hL9BCu/CJ/xYblI7RRtcj8=; b=mg9XC/+trSLu3E3iOKDiLEcyYXpueJLo8rDMXA1ROqkcr36FBa4bJNvTpPVW/2kzFA J5k640eY+OItvpVFjGirtrxh/xQu0qD8mr8M14/NSNJ3n6QmOvrCho8JRY1GzyuHRMAO X2wLECX/qPpoJcKHrw3502biWTDfWctC5DwBDp/o5yDBkur6vGHHxq5O3gDWtUspBA/w LYO60D3+nw7SnEoEseODmoiNr1jyg/9f9mPp/ZEONahXIvUJIeisd329yeEKj3cBkI9m jbNruRFPVeMEgHuZ28Oxx7HD9YJE0lOoWDqW+1aLCoeJNWZyvAIWJGT/FZcjZwqf+DgX lSlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lOV4zib5kyI/PG0VeFtV8hL9BCu/CJ/xYblI7RRtcj8=; b=S4IQU1IOp0DhJksQeiyg5c2oty27AlQ/c9vpk/FNKeD43fzkCLOe7CAqObhTLsl3JO sQRgeGqVkTR2eVDjROCvjuKFFwuhg5MjE6ZZ/Lsup+RAGekNOKUhFIKuZYlJK9IpJlMk dgfCwfhZ15LL6Je+QNp7fFTZ0WtQxhAQP7/pLpAbxCzt7Gtot9s25NJ9Eo37ZC3MgbVH EoKSsHvnawjrLk20QpHppgQGYcEz7I8IEfiJQzQX3JaTzFQDJ0LFru+TZoyObOSR/O21 oduGMMdlkgyHU12Pw/iNhkOhnGV+P/2dD+JsQ/0gRKuX6M1W3zn3XsrBdfgEyAMVmpUg XepA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKn/72Xk3q24zV3V1qIT89c82KwAVdDtmPAerRHksPQM5j1kOPkCEs6QD0rulzfBQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.167.42 with SMTP id zl10mr1975771wjb.0.1468855166956; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (124.25.176.95.rev.sfr.net. [95.176.25.124]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e4sm1791872wjw.27.2016.07.18.08.19.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
References: <CDD4C92E-863F-40FE-8D58-D764C9533FAA@cisco.com> <876b2dda-340c-c0e6-6323-a736a1e8e504@gmx.de> <9aa67689-aeba-4b28-86c2-04bd03e8941b@gmail.com> <c7dbe81b-6d7b-4dfb-33ba-f13f499abb0c@gmx.de>
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6b0d38b6-fd70-c3bf-7365-dc1e75f1df1e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:19:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c7dbe81b-6d7b-4dfb-33ba-f13f499abb0c@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/4XjTdv7K8E7pkwkAqqHKDz8i11E>
Cc: "draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:34:40 -0000

Hi Julian,

Pardon me, I was confusing this with the mentioned changes in EMCA's JSON specification (which hardly is considered as "normative" by the development community and therefore should be left out of the RFC).

Anders

On 2016-07-18 17:11, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2016-07-18 16:45, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>> On 2016-07-18 16:11, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I believe this document needs an Appendix (next to Appendix A) which
>>> summarizes what's actually different from RFC 7159.
>>
>> This gives a whole new meaning to the word "normative"...
>>
>> Anders
>
> Looking at
> <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-00.txt>,
> the information is actually there (in Section 1.3). But it is still
> weird that we have an appendix for one but not the other.
>
> To clarify, I'm looking specifically at the change in
> <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-00.txt#part-4>
> (yeah for anchors in the HTML diff!).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>