IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> Tue, 08 October 2013 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF8521F93E4 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.222, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37Qc4C1GrqRy for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6153521F9FA5 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id m20so6358656qcx.15 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z+BK5LJ120cBDgfIuUizY+G3OxukG8TcJf7fwNfkcfM=; b=bckmxvIfXrpvEPkk3b9ZkVGYv8wocnQtDLxzu4uQNr58VprRYgGaZmp80APHeX1pPR lfob8j7azGNNWBdmMbZx+edkXrCcI1oa1X1JRvmB4RutEdddxb/GAh6UYOnhe1X5wOca 3lLmnpGzFTr1h/DlkSOf46HFZ+nNQfbJA6Cd32faLDOafsj/hKijGtmScq5Zljas+f6i W5Cizp0FonNk4vqygmni4p2Bh6p27DbVAa6/hgdMjARPhGSXrSxIjvjIlhSV/TuGZMSP +FwQcg+CIbGk69aZGg9GfHAPqCiO+f0SHOLpWzK6u3AdxyElPGOwIxbmTM57Ny8+9ufm IeoA==
X-Received: by 10.49.35.144 with SMTP id h16mr4769775qej.35.1381262706194; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (out-on-245.wireless.telus.com. [207.219.69.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l2sm77496662qad.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52546563.2000506@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:04:51 -0700
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D3482260661@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <CAHBU6ivjOHyfMeSNPK3+A_4+VVsyH5Y9XDj77J01OZCjdB6wmA@mail.gmail.com> <525429ED.5000705@gmail.com> <04FC3123-33A4-40DA-AD5D-DA543435DE56@wirfs-brock.com> <20131008164219.GA16081@mercury.ccil.org> <52544E3C.7000907@gmail.com> <1D80C95D-7ACC-4AAC-BC5E-7AE4E2FFE650@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <1D80C95D-7ACC-4AAC-BC5E-7AE4E2FFE650@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:05:12 -0000

Yes, agreed.

peter

On 10/08/2013 12:39 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The paragraph on numbers, see below, seems rather dangerous, as well as being incorrect.  The paragraph on strings, also below, ignores all the problems with escaped code units that do not represent a Unicode code point.
> If you have issues with the spec that was produced by TC39, it would be much better if you brought it up with them directly, not here. Few TC39 members are on this list, and the ECMA procedures are really different than the IETF procedures.
>
> --Paul Hoffman

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status