Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 19 March 2017 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840BE129486; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 02:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xcYL43wN9xZA; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 02:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16F7124217; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 02:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.105.94]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1WHV-1bwsAN1b57-00tUf5; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:25:06 +0100
To: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
References: <1fb5849e-8dbf-835d-65b7-2403686248f9@outer-planes.net> <0E32A94D-CE12-4F52-9ED6-8743C49751B4@vpnc.org> <4d2f0fb3-a729-0c17-2394-bc1e005dd612@gmx.de> <d09f9a59-2411-45a0-470c-ea95072fe4fd@outer-planes.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <dad91b19-e774-e239-36d2-9d086cca8e0d@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:25:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d09f9a59-2411-45a0-470c-ea95072fe4fd@outer-planes.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uBpke1fmUveThxwfaEmFDWnPV8ZsclgZtgpfUbHbkZU63cX03CA U2tjX/Jmp2pQ8OXbHy86/rvPQI/AVi78W/t/pATZHX55k/fZ5dBclk3IDXEmMFpalzEhOUj 5Wcz0L2ZmYcw0eR122UXA+ECxRDkxs5FM7j6GvmUpgVVSz6tZJ3UQKODIhb1Z+abYOz2PjL sBPUVxwD6SfpHLthgrXuw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kDX4vTrzAxA=:69ZLjKDKrRDaQ7Mpy9MqLm 8I4L/GPADQAbO5E1lMW6Slyf/ZAO2GHq6uCgEhXo9qilHMYYfCTFbQIIWpLu6P/kmKjZXihp0 dl6cu2BUMszzGETLZ+87+ndHwtbccySLnyo6ubfiUklqqCPECP+lhGiW4ogAO0lYcHe1/rv/6 8HJr90o19uuelZhtLiNM1ojJmE5nUfJ0C+HNGgCqLkE1wsHxyc+1gd9XEuF/iqmPcShJu5vzh fxGAEyDO8P7J+dNBsGFrEqS9TqhNtjOuyCJ2YbnPOWlBefdDQzYpU5hx8qAd6TT89CgK/QXSu Ugt6T3j1x82LHY5NJy4gYZkh8Uc6ou4Dica6syC2KHehd9VUZ/Q05Np2LnjsNafaCCag++//9 1enWqswwIiS7JdSDEF23NiABocOv4Lb2I3ZfDrnp3Z+cBX5pmkBaakj06IxrQiIlmiPpc3kMD 0PC/o6Zhb0eGyHyPEzjzhOJMSu8kt84qqUXO2PIfsiV+2RdvSPwwQDivNogGBzygFObkIxY6U JbA7oIf+8FZA3yHM/vwCgyd+N0HkdukPu1UTLhoTWrw5oAJd259cTlQzXSAPOEC9SEcTCus2j 1QAQhevZp+cSgM1g/dDnTDC5cb0aGkmvmXAjMTFHTYWGvpQrh2Luy9T3g5K/2QWaTP4+6l+Xp 7SyZamBaX7fBGqTocuBNxIcDmFuKtrhUMw1R3j9o0IW0TL5POxnkw1I+/jEAumOVyRzdTzrkv b/wNeZ5KF7KF9Cd44R8gYB4vPhFoa9lsbb1UB8bblK8kzGTSDdc7TDk9EfGibyVJM3z1NRaiH zOvHIp0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/5s7ggPTx0mnmvFoEs0fJ2S8MlgY>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 09:25:11 -0000

On 2017-03-18 20:26, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
> Hello JSONbis,
>
> After a lengthy discussion about encoding, I see no consensus on a
> change.  Therefore, the current text for Section 8.1 will remain as it is.
>
>
> Thank you all,

A very big -1 on this.

I agree there was no consensus on a normative change, but I heard many 
people agreeing that we could clarity here.

Best regards, Julian