IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits

R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 22 June 2013 03:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE3221F9605 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKyjd4yz2KOH for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7ED21F95D7 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id x54so6905675wes.4 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2qyN7ATYgl4vfGXXaYn1VjjWfUKONasX1vUiMUJ4qKA=; b=hHli0RVjMnUAKxP1G4Tkg8b/2HTMnx8OsXH13JZXluu2LylABMgqkCVVSJABuS6DVG CikfTJmgA86JqQGFphLh0Ihzvby3J85mixezNeaD3+mAmiA1gxV30mlnx2/sZDVj5pjn LCAzU0+PfNKOFn0prlu7mdzuhkdc4SpBLoiP1kPkuARH4ikUoZGzFGEOT7AGhXPE68SD E1xNTAEu3hqOCs3q7Ln7iZuD01MfiOy1+ckZA114lgnqCXXRSdYcXErCRKMB2FEO+ipa 5sFeAR5woSSdR8c3hIV+n5GUVYhzuR7gsgWGzifqcr9CqQgjZnOflhgfJqSbZhciYotZ qPqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.84 with SMTP id fa20mr621676wic.49.1371871904806; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.44.138 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DF7FAA2F-FDF4-4F2B-9429-D3F46B1E2029@tzi.org>
References: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70FC60963@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <44C998F8-D6D0-4E6E-BFCF-BA7E36A36892@vpnc.org> <DF7FAA2F-FDF4-4F2B-9429-D3F46B1E2029@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SypFJm5r0HVq6BzNHTfycq8HEuMiWTrLGtA8rf_gGZbcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2404c903c8804dfb5d186"
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 03:31:48 -0000

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

>
> This is less a matter of consensus, than of correctness.



Fully disagree. The existing specification is imperfect, but running code
seems to exist.

- Rob

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status