Re: [Json] Nudging the English-language vs. formalisms discussion forward

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Wed, 19 February 2014 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607281A04F4 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:06:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSEGS6cMND77 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C69A1A04F7 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1WGDPG-0002Vs-2l; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:06:10 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:06:10 -0500
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Message-ID: <20140219200609.GB8132@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <C87F9B96-E028-4F0E-A950-B39D3F68FFE7@vpnc.org> <CAMm+LwhUh_yN-hzaoDWfrO_H2iGvYvj99BCE4EcYmgqCPqXoVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6itpttXBfVQGKw=u==k_XSdrht81+m_YDNZP6RM+=9CNow@mail.gmail.com> <20140219163059.GA18485@mercury.ccil.org> <CAK3OfOjzVJRVzZbj+MtsX4CNEpK70eYSdu6boQKxJmWLdrCH=g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOjzVJRVzZbj+MtsX4CNEpK70eYSdu6boQKxJmWLdrCH=g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/7ylH64PTLRycDQPWTN5GfM4V1VE
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Nudging the English-language vs. formalisms discussion forward
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:06:19 -0000

Nico Williams scripsit:

> I get that some don't want any JSON schemas, to which my answer is: so
> don't use them.  But please refrain from fallacious arguments.

We tried not using XSD schemas.  Didn't work.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan
If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves.
        --Murray Gell-Mann