IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed document set from this WG

Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9E021F8904 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hzYqdNQcAbiC for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1462221F88F1 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id dr12so6546266wgb.23 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qB/0TMVIKQxwrTt4iI2CRhW235jyByRh7pV4hQRkO6k=; b=e3CfPgXWjBwGDoC2VEwZSg2fehhR38nfhDfxXlRYBvOmwE04d8fcFg5vkQ3BpF/vMx sfFt6ICUi87Q8LE4hJ2L/st/7rHHSPMx7Wb0EJZBtSijiM/MRwBffevFcZEQUlqH2Gl2 aIKBuoVuWiW7RYW6ufANtVYJr2fyx1oAW+7h29tibOVWU75GCqZ8Z0xkco2yA9cwwj6z KF1EG88Z+gTHY/JBww4RwNhyS5bIjE4CgmgXZXu6GMSQahkobQIsUfCTk3xVDoNi5xlZ B1cK9BS3CtniJuVt1V0mBjP3ppKWl9nqMav09vIRv5NwY7fHoM6wcvuR9O/jOLa0EOG9 5HDQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.91.106 with SMTP id cd10mr17610581wib.6.1361384862454; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.138.170 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F89AF14@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <734F6B55-2AA7-44A6-A636-7221C8518479@vpnc.org> <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F89AF14@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sy6Rh+RBhGLQ8cJeznsYAEB=_80doeB5S4GecF-VK_iYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed document set from this WG
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:27:51 -0000

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
<jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> 15.12.1.2: JSONText can be any value, not just object or array.  I think
> this would be a positive change for 4627bis, perhaps with a note that
> older processors are likely to reject any top level that is not an object
> or array.

Ah, yes. I had forgotten about that large change. I think most JSON
implementations support it at this point.

- Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email