Re: [Json] Proposal to move forward on acceptable roots

Jacob Davies <jacob@well.com> Wed, 04 June 2014 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cromis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EB21A02F0 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHR1oRkjRiSD for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E783E1A0024 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c1so6785196igq.10 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WdB7pGrYYyy9f5UiwXxXLisVkMtPHREuhaiVlCNb048=; b=QAVGFso24ZU+9QdZed8BoKX8KLMXuMeg4+JNkacvFvtwZaWIUpgtMG3O8ldKl+vX5i 3x9XS6htnlvqE+rYBljXniHNlyB+z1+GUQQhGVlwMwH8VEKu8xFXM0rG4zJZ8XdJKZUf 5il1Oc6E+4XvrdnZmGCqe3/bEDpMN7x6RX0HZhxMYC9kFDigsPEdX8jbMKTTsmc3iANW cFLOj8nRzK9A7nhzrajhVM1zGzQBpZkwTBslmFoQaAt96d/+RRhvWlLJRLFkiHR9ptEQ C9IzFn+GmGfuy26fEYgx5lI+0iJJ1VnX8w5EHnrnhX4y0N2m0s1fwOEKOfBmolXBLa7z 0j5g==
X-Received: by 10.50.122.67 with SMTP id lq3mr11499899igb.8.1401915148509; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cromis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.89.133 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iuDz-RwKAKq-jsNWTnGTbeBLMGcePHx5dqBD6axoAu54Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CFAE0A52.4C56C%jhildebr@cisco.com> <CAOXDeqpOpDGffggUmYp_8wMgRy=++mMaCRuFVJJQ3e9znA56Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iuDz-RwKAKq-jsNWTnGTbeBLMGcePHx5dqBD6axoAu54Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Davies <jacob@well.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:52:08 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QqjjC5rRCS4sNjnymyZhoJHESqk
Message-ID: <CAO1wJ5Tf-tTEK=n48Ycky8yx62Fo6sj46mnZB14Ho9RQtXhGWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/8orMySNFvarXdO0CAiaYJFNB3_U
Cc: Matthew Morley <matt@mpcm.com>, "Joe Hildebrand \(jhildebr\)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposal to move forward on acceptable roots
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 20:52:36 -0000

Should you mention "in a string element" in the binary- & date-encoding advice?

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
> OK, I’ve got a i-json-01 in progress at
> http://www.tbray.org/tmp/draft-ietf-json-i-json-01.html which I think
> captures all the consensus calls and also includes a “Protocol-design
> Recommendations” section and drops the array-or-object top-level constraint.
>
> Diffs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=http://www.tbray.org/tmp/draft-ietf-json-i-json-00.txt&url2=http://www.tbray.org/tmp/draft-ietf-json-i-json-01.txt
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Matthew Morley <matt@mpcm.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
>> <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> One way we could go on the topic of what goes in the root that would work
>>> for me would be for us to add a non-normative section to I-JSON giving
>>> protocol design advice, and move the issue of potential incompatibility
>>> of
>>> non-[object,array] roots to that section.
>>>
>>> Into that section, we can also put some suggestions about how to encode
>>> integers, floats, and dates in strings, how to do forward-compatibility
>>> with objects (MUST ignore what you don't understand), and whatever other
>>> pearls of wisdom we come up with.
>>>
>>> Yes, I know that will make the document take longer, and open up other
>>> areas for us to argue about.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joe Hildebrand
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> json mailing list
>>> json@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthew P. C. Morley
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> json mailing list
>> json@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>>
>
>
>
> --
> - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
> https://keybase.io/timbray)
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>