Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> Sat, 09 December 2017 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFC61274A5; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 11:19:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5D2PAx37s9_9; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 11:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9005312704B; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 11:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d141so2706274qkc.12; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 11:19:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Vi8Zif+ipraehNZaMoBJQdWIUoKzQGxQq4LHhAbQuLk=; b=aGTp1zxlzP0PBxVske957SKYXgMysfTuNAZexMNT2iGX8Yuj6xmePMuBMpAk2YrizV 1bVJLGagi7r+BZYO1O01N8HKiZBzO2gAWUIgkHtAlLtgyRoC02QQMaRuKRPISTp3xLIW 27x0QtB0cFqQCjAHLt5NnLCYmcHe6mDUChvhyhgIeR+wG1ImrcBZCPEcf/9jmE5ICvhS 7/RNiG9AK3AufPSlEiqJTHD6biatLtJO9SFelmop+pQVt6wHHBwmtkS/YRnkRnIBgvAf XGLwj6lSVdU+q3aub9QSPZx0n8+SIU+1D3gHHyITe9pg1oL2KZxuga+fjPOgkpAl988R 52XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Vi8Zif+ipraehNZaMoBJQdWIUoKzQGxQq4LHhAbQuLk=; b=RLKYYz1T5/36bEwOCyYR4zE4eipe7SYeqSrwbPsp65iod5WFCcf9/nYJhFHSqoogXX KPQInrpgQNu0XqsyPCxTjxbU5ehJ5bXjKNgnBdY0wjWQIS9PEpL6SyDPwTZBQgp20TMh 8JXz/VK0yED8MlBJtc6QtY4sHgL6cN4s8M6vM6KTjq8musKIgFUI11kpgMGmvf7uWxz+ LK6xfskProdAsnLVdJ11P+BAfayNIgHVdOqfYlioxbcDmkpepAsit1rIhXI1q5gXAzWZ UC7EKv+yTxpyO6DZ8RCg+rv/aB94V3BDDXGCVe1Okw2/a5Jvf3PutLs9VLbv4kOKoCIi rVFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLSW27NsZmiuAhUwW1dVlsyC1BkQ2QnwLQlNqRrDRfDzzfV79kE b9BJpuSsigUtOMGfxlX5yNzmUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb9m6qtTKgefv7M25q4oiN9egbxmFEnUBmSDWWkODUkQ4Um6cSEQAq5jIU45k2HEyEC4OM9SQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.115.130 with SMTP id o124mr41684329qkc.260.1512847195599; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 11:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.88.142] ([199.4.160.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k51sm2019371qtc.33.2017.12.09.11.19.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Dec 2017 11:19:54 -0800 (PST)
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, json@ietf.org
Cc: jsonbis-chairs@ietf.org
References: <150669032129.14118.1441258768913961205.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <14b239c8-e17c-0ca2-561b-83b2bbd57516@gmx.de> <0a167b10-bb3b-7bac-2906-63c459230645@isode.com> <e986c580-b6df-3736-ebed-4b06d761853c@gmx.de> <1510238425.3520771.1167030728.53A2E4C7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <a5e7b81b-0596-26b5-48cb-22fde33825e8@gmx.de>
From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <26654843-a256-dcd4-8f4b-3910517eb3e9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 11:19:51 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a5e7b81b-0596-26b5-48cb-22fde33825e8@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-CA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/8xoBmJVwJZcP_Ie2nhaFduUJiCc>
Subject: Re: [Json] jsonbis - Not having a session at IETF 100
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 19:19:59 -0000

On 12/08/2017 09:00 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2017-11-09 15:40, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> ...
>> I've seen a copy of the to-be-published document, but I am not sure if
>> it would be Ok to distribute it publicly.
>> ...
>
> FWIW:
> <https://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-404.htm> is
> the new version.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json

>From that document:

A definition of the JSON syntax was subsequently published as IETF RFC 4627
in July 2006. ECMA-262, Fifth Edition (2009) included a normative
specification of the JSON grammar.  This specification, ECMA-404, replaces
those earlier definitions of the JSON syntax.  Concurrently, the IETF
published RFC 7158/7159 and in 2017 RFC 8259 as updates to RFC 4627. The
JSON syntax specified by this specification and by RFC 8259 are intended to
be identical.


Not exactly what I was hoping for, but at least 8259 is listed as a normative
reference.

peter