IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"

"HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com> Mon, 17 April 2017 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C85213178C for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B1TBrIlLTjko for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A66D4131784 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0083689.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v3HJ5ARo034915; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:08:52 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0083689.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 29w19ugy9w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:08:52 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3HJ8qBh010161; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:08:52 -0400
Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3HJ8aXQ009478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:08:47 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.151]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:08:30 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCG.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.7.214]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.151]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:08:30 -0400
From: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>
CC: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"
Thread-Index: AQHSt61rncR3U2Zdz0+qv2Tts8xqGqHJ7LSA
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:08:30 +0000
Message-ID: <A5FB3750-906A-4E1C-B01E-ADAB6400E038@att.com>
References: <e69d7c21-85cb-45f4-c0c2-34c624e63049@outer-planes.net> <14252631-AD76-4537-89BF-6368F4A8CDF4@att.com> <7e6af21f-16ea-a3bc-9c01-595ae8acebba@gmx.de> <05100401-88D4-4158-A3FF-3EF144D85449@att.com> <CAD2gp_T0bfpnsCA_t4BAMtEhr7p8JkZggjnY4F+m9-M2hWLfmw@mail.gmail.com> <1e94516c-9c82-8b0e-0d2d-7dbaa83b21bd@outer-planes.net> <40e3207f-e047-c898-1f0c-4422de1d597a@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <1b3ec14a-927a-8d46-e3d3-9807a9588437@outer-planes.net> <CAHBU6ivsq8+Z=MMkUH+=Q0uwc5NCtaJLYw5cp0Qg8eX2hQQ6sA@mail.gmail.com> <b74cb31b-8e04-17d0-548a-fc164ce07c05@outer-planes.net> <20170417175627.GK23461@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20170417175627.GK23461@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.91.110.223]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FC9DA5D438EECA4A8D143B995B5B9627@LOCAL>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-04-17_15:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1704170168
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/94eu_p2lT-mpHYOUiIZBCxe_52c>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 19:09:01 -0000


On 4/17/17, 1:56 PM, "json on behalf of Nico Williams" <json-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

    On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:41:29AM -0600, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
    > [ /me doffs hat ]
    > 
    > Thinking about this more, putting an encoding detection algorithm as an
    > appendix seems like a reasonable compromise to me.  To start, how about
    > removing the detection text from Section 8.1 and have an appendix that
    > starts with that text plus the table?
    
    Or we could even just assert that such an algorithm is possible, and
    that implementors MAY implement one.
    
    > Assuming the above, what does everyone think of the following for
    > Section 8.1?
    
    +1.


I’ve argued before for having the encoding detection algorithm put into an appendix. If it were, I also vote +1 to the rewording.

	Tony Hansen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email