Re: [Json] Radically changing 4627bis

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 09 October 2013 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49CC21F9B6A for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.227, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aGw1qDNtTO3Q for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A330321F9C28 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r99NVJgc039903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:31:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D3482260D4F@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:31:19 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A24CFDD-2634-4B11-A1F6-5E93231B0184@vpnc.org>
References: <20131008234810.28645.8207.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBU6isT8yv4-xf+cL0-RCdNu6DB=6G97MSaR7Z=F-Fz11BM3w@mail.gmail.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E11531C3C187@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <E2C3B3A8-3897-44B4-8C9B-A784F63EED59@vpnc.org> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D3482260D4F@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "json@ietf.org WG" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Radically changing 4627bis
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:31:27 -0000

On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:

>    are you saying you think ECMA-404 is unsuitable as a normative reference for 4627bis, because it's handling of Unicode semantics is incorrect? 

No, that's not what I said.

> Is the problem technical or political?

Technical.

> (Number of emails on a subject is not a good metric of controversy, just of familiarity.)

And that's not what I said either. I said "important"; note the difference?

--Paul Hoffman