IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Status of 7159bis

Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com> Mon, 09 January 2017 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21FA129C13 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:46:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qijOkksRpULU for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:46:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8AC8129C0F for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id r126so1202673wmr.3 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 03:46:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Ebpr+HM56Av0MJ8JCgALrnjOEqQLZiEil/5fn/vxABo=; b=Y5DmFz8u362uzlvTaD6m7C6zMjbpVWjtGzfzpn5j7RUGxL3ud9sJwCXy/O2bgFdwFP OZAMGvCysupGTtOEPo1v7yvWxWnJC02nQtBGeEMwW0AVRyeIkA0ZONqYf/L1nr7AY+rI y6f9PI/kvg0S7b+dpMoRjxWB34dc/pA6/GezqUqlkuuih+IV7qSci40ewEg6qABQIwsP 418opdwDfIOrf4OJ1AJ6yGLXrzkYsTU15E39z2R2CYCOZZCXb7GdPdSNGlAozb3tlWLv FwI8KW1lj8j/q2PpwQT4YArJk/tBoG81kTYSYIXQMLuXWTFl8oAQVJt92pVM1PONQEPR HOQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ebpr+HM56Av0MJ8JCgALrnjOEqQLZiEil/5fn/vxABo=; b=aCUD95zFiH3lIwWhoS69Es57rnMwgukwDEXT59Bn+oqwq6xGLcRfO0OOr63t+gWZ6w 3I2PHb1VNlO00qz/TLAxyALX/GNBvkG+9EEdinjKL+L25zRrLq7offs+yQlrqUaZTWWW 6nvz1YWDEtPJR8wTOxlATJXpdNl1l6y7YyGcQ38gfRXVTDcl1+4TwDKL37wdOuSmT2VC MD0JpEGwQDm5n7fxPENwz2xELfve3KRwTWxvcAoivm+QhpoQTLsnd4XQHdOxvNviwCLL Y8qGDKG+b2AbPoAQQ/wFeNkISUAvTj5N49C/8TjPdX1kPGWs3hmPgPakENx2dq8ABIDR CBxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLppPDg2huDlSRsIn4u0GNHlaNhvSIbgjm+eCO3wahiNrjXXmt2a95rXNK1nHx1trPd45XhuAN/GzD07Q==
X-Received: by 10.223.172.245 with SMTP id o108mr14288895wrc.39.1483962402611; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 03:46:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.83.101 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 03:46:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ba0f9df3-028b-9d98-2a72-f9dd289e0056@gmail.com>
References: <7f687476-a694-0f7d-2e2f-84d23a9ea430@gmx.de> <78D16356-4962-445D-A513-44E432F6C87F@fastmail.fm> <c25e8737-a6fb-031d-75b1-3112e12c0d8e@gmail.com> <6BC16581-9781-4704-B763-401EF9C2142C@fastmail.fm> <ba0f9df3-028b-9d98-2a72-f9dd289e0056@gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 06:46:41 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: kWwtwzV4Arm1LJREhBQS3jZ6CSs
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwha=wv0eaMntNHfHp+i514fZ4duDAgaRDq+gjTqYT10aQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c048ade28b60545a7eb99"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/9uiySrX-0TxEh6UYoS_YDnG3bHw>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: [Json] Status of 7159bis
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 11:46:47 -0000

​ECMA 404 not found? Well there's your problem.​

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Anders Rundgren <
anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2017-01-09 10:59, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8 Jan 2017, at 19:48, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/08/2017 12:44 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>>> Hi Julian,
>>>>
>>>> On 7 Jan 2017, at 15:35, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just noticed that the document went to state "Publication Requested"
>>>>> early December, with no notification of the working group, and (IMHO) some
>>>>> of the few feedback that the document received during WG LC being ignored
>>>>> (such as <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/current/msg03945
>>>>> .html> and <https://www.ietf.org/mail-arc
>>>>> hive/web/json/current/msg03978.html>).
>>>>>
>>>>> What's going on here?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I moved it to the Publication Requested state in datatracker in order
>>>> to get the document done and get the WG closed. Negotiations with the WG
>>>> chair and document editor are ongoing. WGLC comments will be handled (or at
>>>> least replied to).
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Alexey
>>>>
>>>
>>> Progress on this document was waiting for progress on ECMA 404.  I don't
>>> see
>>> that anything has happened with ECMA 404, so this document can't
>>> progress.
>>>
>>
>> It is quite the opposite: If the document doesn't progress, ECMA is not
>> going to do anything.
>>
>
> Which highlights the impossibility having two normative standards for the
> same thing.
> Dropping the references to ECMA is the only sensible way forward.
>
> Anders
>
>
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> json mailing list
>> json@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email