IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 18 March 2014 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D82A1A0717 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTIAxiDfH_wS for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD221A0721 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbJTE-1WiZI719oC-00InKB; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:02:51 +0100
Message-ID: <53286E29.90105@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:02:49 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
References: <53277484.70305@cisco.com> <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de> <EC3168FE-EA36-4036-8B36-974FDA7BD88E@vpnc.org> <532864FC.8040700@gmx.de> <CE6D04D1-C063-41E6-A635-3AD8127B6F28@vpnc.org> <5328687D.9050509@gmx.de> <CAHBU6ivhKzENAEkm174=o=QYs8Xj1BS4Rfw0CX_C6bnNP2riNw@mail.gmail.com> <53286A3E.3000907@gmx.de> <CAHBU6iswVDWt9=pbJoP6fMQq8jQtcVKs-vptZ7r5oR8PJpAXPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iswVDWt9=pbJoP6fMQq8jQtcVKs-vptZ7r5oR8PJpAXPA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xBbmVDCSIR+TF10ZyRlaXhUrnqbfe6N56KP4uvejc+zLdcte7gn Q4x1Eg1Pv9eAm8O0KvLeuWRr1nJJqZ/1dwR9gb7cp4l2wJoGHnRmZvECtFIbzKYpXu12SvL ALpmCwoJFvxVSo/eDjaQWRYJdRoFl/cVclee0W6XumblOQEWdTUql+hzOEwq15MNAGaHjcz iIGB9fuVq+pnNdxIrkkgg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/ArHWqEDGO0mn371-Wi_G9lmX1Hw
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:03:04 -0000

On 2014-03-18 16:53, Tim Bray wrote:
> Got some examples?  I’ve not seen this, and a search for “json patch” on
> stackoverflow.com <http://stackoverflow.com> has some discussions of the
> draft, but apparently nobody actually doing it.

- The SCIM WG was trying to do this until recently.

- You may also want to search for "rails json patch" - many rails users 
started with application/json and PUT for partial updates, and then 
switched to PATCH, but keeping the media type. This is what prompted 
Mark to raise <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3169>.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email