Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter

Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C69A21F886A for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:25:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-wvXkNnoTSe for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:25:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com (mail-ea0-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46A721F887F for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id d12so3138497eaa.10 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:25:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g48EpQjEiFgj59T8iKM4hx/tzC191ZEKps8oRD8gTrE=; b=KzV67ECENEad90x/hdBaQfPnhoiWgzizIypvFUz5oKA60bc5DHX/b9oqNEg7fjHnnb q9X36g0747v68+m9gGYrzIcO4TEPYWZ554U6rTw7/caj/8YJZKpocm2recCHvquyaJgC M75KwIhIgvogpL7N65cxYnun8Ciiaa94I+R/kKn0zXl2cc0laTg55JP4pZ90MDRNpRpy P5ikGIWXClPJFehwixzmoKHE5ExALQuwpwsAZqttP1YQ9hDKKgFvUR817BglA8NqW8kA LlP58MGrL18YMI/ri2OnD55K7imHHPYUnspGgR+uwzcb+BorKwW+0XPZ6mCYaUEEx6jB b9Dg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.205.68 with SMTP id i44mr63821591eeo.25.1361330704060; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.1.7 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:25:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51243F1C.1030607@stpeter.im>
References: <E0597F3D-773C-4CDD-8087-09B99ADCF156@mnot.net> <CALcybBD-ksPe71YY9BY-NZ9VP0tNqToySn8zp+9swtM=P9MiCw@mail.gmail.com> <95501AA5-EA26-4D74-8C6B-187F0E52C524@mnot.net> <CALcybBA__74RTGwr6f0KV4=pw5jnRLGRs6Y9YtuYi=YBpyAYJA@mail.gmail.com> <51243BC6.8080909@stpeter.im> <CALcybBAKWQ+hH=LEXN-Rn90deGZN4tDtSgLV1dnnkjuLp-_+gw@mail.gmail.com> <51243F1C.1030607@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:25:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CALcybBBH18FKE0-=ZXPZFDT5gqO2DeK5Ta4h9YFaV=xczx6heQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:25:06 -0000

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
[...]
>
> Francis, in case you are new to the IETF, please be aware that IETF
> Working Groups are not formed lightly and tend to be quite tightly
> scoped so that they are able to sustain the energy and focus necessary
> to complete their work in a reasonable amount of time. I don't think
> anyone would disagree with the sentiment that it makes sense to define
> the base specs with the uses of JSON in mind. However, individuals who
> are active in the working group can maintain that awareness without
> adding a lot of additional deliverables to the working group's charter.
>

I am indeed new, and as such may have overreacted. I am fully aware
that a working group has to restrict itself to a tight scope, it is
only natural that it must do so.

As such, I may have overreacted and apologize for the noise.

Please forgive me,
-- 
Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue@gmail.com
Try out your JSON Schemas: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com