IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Response to Statement from Ecma International TC39

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 05 December 2013 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A8F1AE0B6 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:08:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FwAQZriHjyR7 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:08:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E52C1AE0CC for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB5G8dsG016236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:08:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131205065024.GL21240@localhost>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:08:40 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D0709E6C-E78F-4445-AF60-45A9F5BB8BD5@vpnc.org>
References: <C7707CE2-C43E-4171-AE96-9FAFDCE53317@cisco.com> <20131205044253.GH21240@localhost> <CAK3OfOiXdOpe+=DzxgD7HeyN0UTtMCiu+b3Cep4d1ftQPjrxww@mail.gmail.com> <52A01BBA.2040809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <20131205065024.GL21240@localhost>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>, "Matt Miller, (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Response to Statement from Ecma International TC39
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:08:55 -0000

On Dec 4, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:22:50PM +0900, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>> And the other part comes from the fact that I repeatedly got
>> messages from es-discuss-owner@mozilla.org saying:
> 
> Some IETF lists also do that.  

This is off-topic, but I think your statement above has not been true for many years. There was an (informal?) decision by the IESG at least five years ago to change this, and all IETF-run lists were changed, and ones that were run by other organization (such as ones that I ran via IMC and VPNC) were told to change.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email