IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF

Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB30621F87FF for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:30:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RJGjYX0CYg6z for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E2021F86F4 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id a13so3103199eaa.7 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:30:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=waBUnq6Rf/W2QmcP/KAWsm6VILVlT9eKGMi4p9NThow=; b=WLMS/71Lv2lezKiysMQ6oAkWDJ+wJ3QEwy5oRJLVIeRkB04xUdgmesLue2zHOpxrr4 42wiFPWXRWcF2Gjyra1OTZ5mzxDBhsPi13tZtl0xXpd3u0+PAMd5TIOFbehqdjdN0ZDo Y+QG0F7Z7QElx32gYps73flh9MYEMY/ymgjMKUukdhN2YfkMTSxxDUD7b/q2CEWm9FKC K6xsKvmlf7NUCyepR6WzwdNpS6qDLU6dM0mWY6fzl8jqWtTfUQ9d75KgdUjq1XBSIj41 DMZcxXVigTaN2QSiWE9bc0tcAG80a8aQQOa5FiH2dSwwpGy3RQG8jMBD1Gsirj4YMm2S OzSA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.209.131 with SMTP id s3mr62289782eeo.26.1361320191835; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:29:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.1.7 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:29:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1361319479.9790.36.camel@pbryan-wsl.internal.salesforce.com>
References: <CAHBU6iub4vp2QrcGNmAg+2rz=JhP1x7fW43e5L3gNkuLz442wg@mail.gmail.com> <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F898351@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CAHBU6iuCLnF0L4_S7=44Uy8mY+QWmG-Z9QfYMzMb+QNUgqCs0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1361319479.9790.36.camel@pbryan-wsl.internal.salesforce.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:29:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CALcybBCxHFm0h=EbhGjeMv_vnqT+jewZuOYq=R=YQYFQdoNU9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
To: "Paul C. Bryan" <pbryan@anode.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:30:05 -0000

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Paul C. Bryan <pbryan@anode.ca> wrote:
> Should two representations of the same JSON (string) value be c14n'ed
> differently? I think not*.
>
> If not, then I think comparisons would need to occur by parsing JSON strings
> into Unicode codepoints.
>

+1 on that. I see no reason why "a" and "\u0061" should be treated
differently at all.

Or I have completely misundertood the point...

-- 
Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue@gmail.com
Try out your JSON Schemas: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email