IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Thu, 23 March 2017 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3AF127735 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pOEWYOaOIzY2 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com (mail-wr0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC03D1273E2 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y90so39648020wrb.0 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NbA1EI/bHcL/ja6Bjf3JlfQakD3FMuWyP7VOIc/4X+g=; b=ymfG5HYa2Kzt53klP87vakZ4e0YlYdmbK++cFvc1c7Lcdibvg9Fn+Dcn2PrL8iYKcO hT08FZKf+K1YUr06MEJJXJgm/vgs1UAIwm7rSa6Vf+ZzteusdTd18hFxM0GfwK2IN9iL 0sEv2InHe9ecJbt3cZnDQIfdqWOSNdVUwPqLNqAGs3EWMNFf4WatQlCrCB70ffyFwMIP 2RKub/iK8+8SSJvBo7tCpCMMVN/N/y1KiVWAi85Ug2EFMJxFZPmBJ+VzKHcIfNoiPHTE R1wLY6O0Ca7qUJhHNaWVlKSG0fte5CIvaSR5XUydLwoUzPPBG2u1s0c6hr0IX/1lWgoU paQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NbA1EI/bHcL/ja6Bjf3JlfQakD3FMuWyP7VOIc/4X+g=; b=Fvkm0w09xBln7mXBFq5E29O1Rpa3l22M6ZM66LP845uwCz6p7lc7+mwuuAGZsp4Dll zZlMK9q0V91Rqkf+lwYHkuM6jiFG+FHfwIE7v4INuZIMAT8avSs9hdF5Wqw4OYG7Ikh8 gJ/NLZpL2OzTiHtHxrQQDmeO7m7mJLDBouuN9fITO/DoKhaXbThBO5GTHrul3mkozucM NHrhd2orAOftq3MJsOzFQDQYZuTObH+hXhiKGsG+fS1P4a2WTQ8IqQJ+qCJO03tAtszx g0veYlLJTJLIQ7s6SG5EKCWhBR01wh5Q6TaQ0W00nphQ9Vj2QZHMUYh2/fcBj3kHB56M auSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2/lRB4XBlI8XBRfpdvGybAY+ngHM/Ftu74dUc9aJfbcnspcJyrH4lyjRj25MNTyQOGeqM1F/VnW/BN4XXf
X-Received: by 10.223.133.228 with SMTP id 33mr5359605wru.0.1490311819435; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.181.14 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <06527534-3098-a20c-31ca-0e97fd336c5d@codalogic.com>
References: <1fb5849e-8dbf-835d-65b7-2403686248f9@outer-planes.net> <0E32A94D-CE12-4F52-9ED6-8743C49751B4@vpnc.org> <4d2f0fb3-a729-0c17-2394-bc1e005dd612@gmx.de> <d09f9a59-2411-45a0-470c-ea95072fe4fd@outer-planes.net> <dad91b19-e774-e239-36d2-9d086cca8e0d@gmx.de> <ac432615-ee84-3cdf-6b37-480626bd18c1@gmx.de> <804f9930-26a5-a565-0607-452b386cfeb5@outer-planes.net> <D89BCFAA-B81F-4EEB-8B3A-180BAAB9D16C@att.com> <e69d7c21-85cb-45f4-c0c2-34c624e63049@outer-planes.net> <14252631-AD76-4537-89BF-6368F4A8CDF4@att.com> <7e6af21f-16ea-a3bc-9c01-595ae8acebba@gmx.de> <05100401-88D4-4158-A3FF-3EF144D85449@att.com> <CAD2gp_T0bfpnsCA_t4BAMtEhr7p8JkZggjnY4F+m9-M2hWLfmw@mail.gmail.com> <1e94516c-9c82-8b0e-0d2d-7dbaa83b21bd@outer-planes.net> <06527534-3098-a20c-31ca-0e97fd336c5d@codalogic.com>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:29:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_QwwHqnCxV1ZVEYVK7Bn7qyGG2iS0Wm_dEn6PGGcwtBAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pete Cordell <petejson@codalogic.com>
Cc: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf+ietf@outer-planes.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114922a89a3a32054b6e42ce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/CQrcs3s6FanjNHvdCsc_IIjiMOE>
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for Consensus: Proposed Text for "8.1 Character Encoding"
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:30:23 -0000

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Pete Cordell <petejson@codalogic.com>
wrote:

> (3) is where I'd like to be and where I believe most implementations are
> based on list discussion.  This would seem to align the bis RFC with what's
> deployed, which seems the best approach for interoperability.
>
> Also (1) for when not 'application/json' media type.
>

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email