IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposal: the minimal edit

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Tue, 25 June 2013 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3179511E80F8 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0IoU8EgoNhc for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5D311E80F1 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1UrJ4E-0007Ti-VP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:33:15 -0400
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:33:14 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <20130625023314.GD14060@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <CAHBU6ivhoUM9cfUnc1YfnyDdQnWQ=Mj10cSoYn0qouMQ0F94XA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SyQDjik_BTojXdw3G7_B=W5iZXksuM15VYwGJqr8WHdhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SwbFfR5UQuU2ceJhDeGAhv5Zy0dKA3szzO_KGfjA7fx5Q@mail.gmail.com> <B4858680-D319-4603-A1C3-D6A84195B300@vpnc.org> <CAHBU6ivUL6YvtMiajQwfftNgrRJk4dqiFs1yowoxfLi5wh2_hQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130624233521.GF19899@mercury.ccil.org> <3D442E5F-F9ED-47DB-9E1D-29ACA8588717@vpnc.org> <20130625011904.GJ19899@mercury.ccil.org> <5FF84B9F-F637-48AC-921F-173F3370EF17@vpnc.org> <6DE2EFD8-4FE4-410E-AB0C-B0B34F313FEB@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6DE2EFD8-4FE4-410E-AB0C-B0B34F313FEB@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: "json@ietf.org WG" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposal: the minimal edit
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:33:21 -0000

Paul Hoffman scripsit:

> Given a section titled "Differences from the JSON Definition in
> ECMAScript" that begins "The following lists the known major differences
> between this document and the definition of JSON in Section 15.12 of
> [ECMA]", what would you say about the perceived difference in the
> code points that ECMAScript implementations can generate and consume
> relative to RFC 4627?

Actually, I wouldn't say anything at this stage, now that I think
about it.  The time to write a list giving the differences between
ECMA-JSON and RFC-JSON is after we know what it is that RFC-JSON says.
Right now we don't.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Thor Heyerdahl recounts his attempt to prove Rudyard Kipling's theory
that the mongoose first came to India on a raft from Polynesia.
        --blurb for Rikki-Kon-Tiki-Tavi

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status