[Json] Fwd: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (3922)

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 20 March 2014 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C921A08B7 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.362
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.362 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3IJmMWbbNLEf for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EAA1A08B3 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp []) by scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CA5332E567 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:49:35 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (unknown []) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 2dc7_0e04_9019aaf0_b00c_11e3_a04d_001e6722eec2; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:49:34 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown []) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7420C042B for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:49:34 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <532AAB97.5040404@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:49:27 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
References: <532A4493.3030804@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <532A4493.3030804@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <532A4493.3030804@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/C_NF-uGl3TIHBnQl0gXWCwA208U
Subject: [Json] Fwd: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (3922)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:49:46 -0000

Forwarded because this didn't go to the JSON list.   Martin.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (3922)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:29:55 +0900
From: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University

I think it's better as rejected, otherwise, there's a higher chance of a
similar one popping up in the future.

Regards,    Martin.

On 2014/03/20 05:23, Barry Leiba wrote:
> I'd sat this shouldn't be marked "Rejected", but should instead be removed
> from the errata system.  What does the RFC Editor think?
> Barry
> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>> Please reject this errata report. There was a conscious decision made by
>> the RFC Editor to issue the new RFC; the fact that the reporter doesn't
>> like that decision does not warrant an errata.
>> --Paul Hoffman, JSON WG co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json