Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04.txt

"Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net> Mon, 14 August 2017 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E53D1321B9 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outer-planes-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9hAWpkkJUHL for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x242.google.com (mail-yw0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C79120713 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x242.google.com with SMTP id n83so6522743ywn.3 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outer-planes-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=KYUVOJNFyXAmurdPcnysn2FwDPga/QZwG8IX9+92RMI=; b=KJcZX4ss8q6IfpnS6fKuAZdZiFQAT8ajV5Q4dctDUumpM1mpA0nj8nzaxZ3x9CiLA4 KbVuEK6/YQB6KDkY9jWiq8mi9FG0Gd/HNryxvlJOFxXNrlPhmtW1P/xbnZ0TXaMreN9F rfGc/yfSnD9T2GaerCf9ONoY1jQNmSpJalx0hRlYXsNO8HCQGN08UyiVb0G4a20bfBrk eXP5nBvfuCi+o1MTl7wZHG8yj5MTP3n5Sa1rokmZl+w7g5Ur88OHLU4qIhGYKMNCub14 Sxr7Vwk9ACaeWEkkM9QeAlLBilpGKhKhVsCy1BY+PNDK6dq/eNOY7LiQ6YygDe944nPX OFYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KYUVOJNFyXAmurdPcnysn2FwDPga/QZwG8IX9+92RMI=; b=EButOSzzHZPFYHdfenxhR2jJjs+HJiGewsWgOlAEQHtqGck2Q0KgHRG4kRJTkr33ve 0EN10MCzjUJC7ugVRzEgqYILKmRkHwxN8tUvaHb4WCombZCP6ZYhyuNHatz6O5DM2w38 BkZk60vTGbgS/HNici3W78PIKUWlrUmh4fXz9NYBn2bidjaG/BrgtHHE1nHkF21aT7Vg rOKU6hy4G9PseDKyThWI6R9vQvV4pv7Z2ykIuNggEAHBLQ6cEL0vxRk+954vuqmIbhCd QV0AZl2FMCwxEjqXP3aBfG7Bt2uxtiLZ5p7k+GDeklr2eGQMlC6Wd3Ir77b9lAufvDdR Earw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hO5HYcEOunicj/id0L1RSjnYz5+fuFSe9L18EC0WVzCfG06XDC kU5UC6B9392yAotZMLZlvA==
X-Received: by 10.13.212.201 with SMTP id w192mr20196717ywd.100.1502728858114; Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.6.23.170] ([128.177.113.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 204sm2850016ywk.50.2017.08.14.09.40.57 for <json@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: json@ietf.org
References: <150047191184.7507.7143481683564082881@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB9BA7EA-D393-4079-B347-620A09280B26@isode.com> <CAC4RtVBYMrRCrUZ1qqD+_rH4M8N23GOgbbh=921fEYqH+gCm5Q@mail.gmail.com> <c06e583a-965e-9eaf-975f-e6876ac056ed@filament.com> <f1a6b553-c787-e248-67bd-74d68d98a845@gmx.de> <262E8314-263A-4443-B912-AFCF1A3277B2@tzi.org> <166957c4-26fc-90b5-a798-59280c91b466@filament.com> <8B60039F-96DD-4F72-8139-D80B6F11566C@tzi.org> <3760a157-5b88-e334-712c-03eecd675794@codalogic.com> <7a88952c-3e46-3f87-b3c2-2864f216c62d@gmail.com> <9cddf2e7-f987-3942-3580-05c3da6a4805@codalogic.com> <2892a0eb-0bd2-cd2e-87e7-aa2e29009b4b@filament.com> <62d58ceb-282d-329d-3f27-8ed5ef268d13@codalogic.com>
From: "Matthew A. Miller" <linuxwolf@outer-planes.net>
Message-ID: <20320239-7afb-5d4a-047f-ae0132e2a0ca@outer-planes.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:40:55 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/55.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <62d58ceb-282d-329d-3f27-8ed5ef268d13@codalogic.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j03JtnqI2LjIXc9G4v4e9LpA9DWW58e9k"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/CwxMRx_jcSpE2GmxjVCgDWgNzFM>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:41:01 -0000

On 17/08/01 10:28, Pete Cordell wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 17:01, Peter Saint-Andre - Filament wrote:
>>
>> We're not writing a novel here. :-)
> 
> I had been thinking that too.  I do like the direction of focussing the
> requirement on open systems communication though (not to be confused
> with systems built on open software!).  I think the following is pretty
> simple and side-steps issues about what is a network protocol, payload,
> serialization etc.:
> 
> 8.1.  Character Encoding
> 
>    JSON text exchanged between systems that are not part of a closed
>    ecosystem MUST be encoded using UTF-8.
> 
>    Previous specifications of JSON have not required the use of UTF-8
>    when transmitting JSON text.  However, the vast majority of JSON-
>    based software implementations have chosen to use the UTF-8 encoding,
>    to the extent that it is the only encoding that achieves
>    interoperability.
> 
>    Implementations MUST NOT add a byte order mark (U+FEFF) to the
>    beginning of a networked-transmitted JSON text.  In the interests of
>    interoperability, implementations that parse JSON texts MAY ignore
>    the presence of a byte order mark rather than treating it as an
>    error.
> 
> 

Hello JSONbis Working Group,

does anyone have comments on Pete Cordell's suggested text?


- m&m

Matthew A. Miller
< http://goo.gl/LM55L >