Re: [Json] Two Documents

Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name> Wed, 19 June 2013 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan@drees.name>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C128821F944C for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJ2BI9lMMhsm for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.17.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25E321F946C for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newyork.local.box ([93.197.218.44]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MGRMG-1V2TkQ1XqS-00DEp6; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:13:06 +0200
Message-ID: <51C19241.6050003@drees.name>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:13:05 +0200
From: Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
References: <51B9EA49.2050604@crockford.com> <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411528A0E2@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <51C1121E.8050004@crockford.com> <A3CE009B-CF14-4B2F-86C4-E2E06165316E@vpnc.org> <51c16094.a3da440a.212b.ffffbdc5SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <51c16094.a3da440a.212b.ffffbdc5SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0IdIK4CXZkLm3Pv0aCFPGGeuYaL7RkYrgxT6LtBpJupWubd8XNZ 1GeCV4AEKqfwq+LzUcuQSsyBt8PuuGiBAcYKkRhprLHYokUJYm6qjM7EDxtVpuGvDgDXrM4 rktFATeU5cHGTVt0ZXJLHF/QQTN5c/dRJ9c+QtRvSuXNQTsNQR3tdZ9uCkZleBwtEOYN1ST G9OXkpNFR1JAUN1xzo8GA==
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Two Documents
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stefan@drees.name
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:13:14 -0000

On 2013-06-19 09:40 +02:00, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 5:14 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> The parser and generator sections define interoperability
>> specifications. Removing them is a huge change to the technical
>> specification, one that feels well outside of the "minimal changes" in
>> our charter.
>>
>> I still want the WG to later work on an implementation guidance
>> document after we have finished work on refining the current technical
>> specification; in fact, it is probably negligent if we don't make a run
>> at that. But calling requirements on parsers and generators
>> "implementation guidance" at this late date seems like a very bad move.
>
> +1

+1