IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification

R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 02 October 2013 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A779421F9DCB for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gxbXZvzdu2yh for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x230.google.com (mail-qa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CB421F8793 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id hu16so935262qab.7 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=y6FOxShwgEqMcFGFCA7ydpvJlDqkTJBQDnHazi9r7y0=; b=gP2TsHwVPQqRtyY3k81XIYIB0rUMEs2oqmt0NUNWF6Oi/uRAs5r4gjb0qL8xRdoHUa f6L/8n+mr7qtfMAZWfoRUPRGKh281np2UenuFEdWING1g00iIrOKorFy5RKaUurxA8nu xzmFjgtI+xUmNTkEzE75JKfO/eP/ZMVY2Eqk+YE36d7OqzuJ/4YY2J50N6iwu5z9EvqM 6d0pF5nySPo6eJhU7vfxEdGFtXb7PRJ7hIQiI44elExKWJgY61vTozxPd7Ix6tL5FAcz Z8gnhk7gTXDv6N0URjJeBZZKoq9NB+Je8M5RiJNAQboGhlq3iKqXgSdaBTkoqCR/i/1S sF2Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.76.10 with SMTP id a10mr5829691qak.9.1380742583310; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.86.147 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6itBfoNdfLtjhKhWSbwnFj_rmLzCQb++p160VcbiddNLCg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF1BB0B@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAChr6SyznBktmOLpT-EiZ5Nm_0jZ16M0tOo4aZ_jhSDb=HHDqg@mail.gmail.com> <23C96FBA-3419-4C97-A075-462F7443013A@vpnc.org> <CAHBU6is2WzCNCwa0PYMM1Hr3Lij0GxWkVtVUan9=JPbvv0YCZg@mail.gmail.com> <msno49dcetlu4jaelpu2jqk68116v27sgu@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CAHBU6itBfoNdfLtjhKhWSbwnFj_rmLzCQb++p160VcbiddNLCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:36:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Swde-pMAkKNdjk3wE9zgYo7U7i4gP65s5KUCZ+yk5m7FA@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c305a4346c1704e7c72f91"
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:46:38 -0000

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> So, would it be enough to:
>
[snip ...]

> - Have a note that there are differences, with a pointer to section
> 15.12?
>
> I think 15.12 does a good job of describing them.
>

That works for me.

- Rob




>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>wrote:
>
>> * Tim Bray wrote:
>> >So, I (blush) confess to never having read ECMA-262, which is what 4627
>> >references.  I thought I’d have a glance; I'm assuming that what I want
>> is:
>> >
>> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST-ARCH/ECMA-262,%203rd%20edition,%20December%201999.pdf
>>
>> The JSON object was introduced in the 5th edition of the specification,
>> while you have the third edition from 1999. The current edition is 5.1,
>> http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/#sec-15.12 with the JSON
>> object in section 15.12 as linked.
>> --
>> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>> Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>> 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>
>

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status