Re: [Json] Proposed minimal change for duplicate names in objects

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Wed, 03 July 2013 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2580A11E821D for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dW0tnL7UmPpq for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E9A21F9C66 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1UuTOx-0006XO-A5; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:11:43 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:11:43 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <20130703201143.GL32044@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <B86E1D4B-1DC8-4AD6-B8B3-E989599E0537@vpnc.org> <CAK3OfOj3MNNhjwo2bMa5CgoqynzMRVvviBXC8szxt5D17Z7FDg@mail.gmail.com> <51D3C63C.5030703@cisco.com> <51D48023.1020008@qti.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51D48023.1020008@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "json@ietf.org WG" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed minimal change for duplicate names in objects
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:11:53 -0000

Pete Resnick scripsit:

> So I don't think saying RECOMMENDED or SHOULD regarding not
> producing duplicates should be seen as a non-starter. That's a
> defensible position for the WG to take.

+1.  The only person saying otherwise right now is Tim, and he grants
that he is only concerned with a single use case.

-- 
Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.
        --Arthur C. Clarke, "The Nine Billion Names of God"
                John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>