Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 22 June 2013 02:26 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1611C21F9974 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YyIBM-FROZF3 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B66821F9968 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-165.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5M2QgSZ057478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:26:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70FC60963@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:26:41 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <44C998F8-D6D0-4E6E-BFCF-BA7E36A36892@vpnc.org>
References: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70FC60963@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
To: Joe Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 02:26:48 -0000
<chair hat on> On Jun 21, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote: > The posted ABNF for option 1 didn't get the last change that I proposed: > > unescaped = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-D7FF / %xE000-10FFFF The purpose of *this* consensus call is a clarification of the ABNF that would technically match the ABNF in the current draft. The change you propose will be in a different consensus call that is dealing with the subject of code points. --Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Norbert Lindenberg
- [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Norbert Lindenberg
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Norbert Lindenberg
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits R S
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits R S
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: ABNF nits Stefan Drees