Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter

Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 03:04 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51243BC6.8080909@stpeter.im>
References: <E0597F3D-773C-4CDD-8087-09B99ADCF156@mnot.net> <CALcybBD-ksPe71YY9BY-NZ9VP0tNqToySn8zp+9swtM=P9MiCw@mail.gmail.com> <95501AA5-EA26-4D74-8C6B-187F0E52C524@mnot.net> <CALcybBA__74RTGwr6f0KV4=pw5jnRLGRs6Y9YtuYi=YBpyAYJA@mail.gmail.com> <51243BC6.8080909@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:04:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CALcybBAKWQ+hH=LEXN-Rn90deGZN4tDtSgLV1dnnkjuLp-_+gw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter
Precedence: list

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> And that is what I said exactly. Your initial wording let the
>> impression that this working group SHOULD NOT care about the
>> existing, concrete uses of JSON.
>>
>> And this is where I disagree. They SHOULD care. Not steer, but
>> care.
>
> It's not about caring, it's about the working group's contract with
> the IESG and the IETF community at large. It's true that the
> individuals working on base specs in the JSON WG (if formed) will
> probably care about various uses of JSON. It does not follow that it's
> best to work on applications of JSON in the same venue as the base specs.
>

Yes, I agree with that too. My argument is that working on the base
specifications without an awareness of how these existing base
specifications are used is shortsighted.

I may have misinterpreted what Mark said, but this is the impression I
had when reading that part of his first answer.

-- 
Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue@gmail.com
Try out your JSON Schemas: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com

[Json] Comments on the proposed charter Mark Nottingham
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Francis Galiegue
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Mark Nottingham
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Paul Hoffman
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Matt Miller (mamille2)
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Francis Galiegue
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Francis Galiegue
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Francis Galiegue
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter Peter Saint-Andre
Re: [Json] Comments on the proposed charter SM