Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON?
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 26 February 2021 12:03 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBD73A140D for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:03:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-tr8DaZhbdm for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD893A140C for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.152] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Dn7bc48WqzysL; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:03:40 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <90cddfc3-c320-5ac0-210b-c77636383a6b@codalogic.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:03:40 +0100
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6E254975-F9A7-4563-9C12-4FE52180C56A@tzi.org>
References: <90cddfc3-c320-5ac0-210b-c77636383a6b@codalogic.com>
To: Pete Cordell <petejson@codalogic.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/J1imgPcnTVwy4pLkD3KHugOwwHs>
Subject: Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON?
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:03:46 -0000
> Quick question if I may... > > When defining new IETF standards that want to use JSON, are they referencing JSON (RFC8259) or I-JSON (RFC7493)? The answer requires Science (grep through rfc8[3-9]??.txt, so no-one references 7159): 7493 only 8259 only both 7493 and 8259 -------------------------------------- rfc8366.txt rfc8414.txt rfc8416.txt rfc8427.txt rfc8428.txt rfc8460.txt rfc8485.txt rfc8520.txt rfc8522.txt rfc8555.txt rfc8572.txt rfc8576.txt rfc8610.txt rfc8618.txt rfc8620.txt rfc8628.txt rfc8639.txt rfc8688.txt rfc8693.txt rfc8725.txt rfc8727.txt rfc8734.txt rfc8742.txt rfc8743.txt rfc8747.txt rfc8783.txt rfc8785.txt rfc8790.txt rfc8801.txt rfc8805.txt rfc8827.txt rfc8844.txt rfc8877.txt rfc8895.txt rfc8896.txt rfc8908.txt rfc8921.txt rfc8927.txt rfc8935.txt rfc8936.txt rfc8941.txt rfc8949.txt rfc8977.txt No indent is 7493 only, one indent is 8259 only, and double indent is both. (Of course, RFC 8610 and RFC 8949 reference both, one for the JSON format and one for the I-JSON limitations.) Grüße, Carsten
- [Json] JSON or I-JSON? Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? John Cowan
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? David Kemp
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? John Cowan
- Re: [Json] JSON or I-JSON? Phillip Hallam-Baker