Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Sat, 15 March 2014 16:24 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5FB1A00EB for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0FyJY8PNsuap for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-f170.google.com (mail-ve0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1675C1A00EC for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id pa12so4067436veb.15 for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KrISOxfsED429KwN/B+0fix2ER+f0bLRnhcMnLcefUc=; b=ES8nPmvYVmvQQ3LFWCgULCPNMUjdWzLZpJP22Ekcsqz+2tfOTQL2X+uan2SOcqCjYI 0x9vGV8fJDIXQbCbP0TCPtgucCQY+i4zbl7M5++7S7zFuqeqifUEO2Bz90V40JZPWJPo 7eGjg0uFY2yajZUXHFPJbNlCuMRYmKM++PhvfIsoomuyP0bxv7qT0mlmeknJTPVn7wo+ O94LnwyEINtdVzHC5tsMIxHznMdkgcNB6w6XHeVNA+UvlFrze0S7cyAZahgH67+oNIYE yDj7gxEUX+5n9Y+sq6fqMzF+NYwhrMH0RusyraG2dqvnmIAcWSxLLMKBu0eac4zoxG4E lSXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5WSt4M4mSBkVSxWY+/jt/cRBZRGCmUM02Q8QsTrH9UaZaDPEfH46rO2vq0IUQeM49mYbp
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.241.106 with SMTP id wh10mr9950395vdc.16.1394900652635; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.98.73 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.84.235.32]
Received: by 10.220.98.73 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <72u8i9dj6ih7o95cibq44o8kuq8k2dm40l@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <53238F21.2030508@cisco.com> <nll8i999lis5u0f719iv6bgte71d8uus52@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <20140315143553.GC30147@mercury.ccil.org> <72u8i9dj6ih7o95cibq44o8kuq8k2dm40l@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:24:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6it+GfM7RR5q3Rr+Oj5PU4UnK7yW1LPsrXf6FxxoWDNfFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133eb38e5d02e04f4a79def"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/JhTZcGa7NbKcHEMi9ZAjs8nvKIg
Cc: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:24:22 -0000
On Mar 15, 2014 9:17 AM, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > > For human-readable documentation purposes it is entirely sufficient to > say "follows RFC XXXX conventions" and What is XXXX? implementations can just assume > the conventions are being followed until they detect otherwise (which > "I-JSON" implementations are required to do as currently proposed). > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > json mailing list > json@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Tony Hansen
- [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a… Matt Miller
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Nat Sakimura
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Dave Cottlehuber
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … John Levine
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Larry Masinter
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON … Phillip Hallam-Baker