Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equality
Jacob Davies <jacob@well.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 22:23 UTC
Return-Path: <cromis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F292721F9E11 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zar95SyeGt84 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7488721F9DEC for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id g10so981643qah.12 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=wo9YmwTjbwDBBTkeO5v6ofyBTOXzkyaWf/TgV18vf5s=; b=rOKFQMaSh5XXX8rS+N+ZjDgSWSdnaPz1BUkS4etu0K4SFYo58AjjFjU4i1XyKXUmjc bh56/HHjj/JE1CbOshKVJLDdKvZAPr1IoIpM1VV82dFGzs4GRwRAs1w5e5saby8PDHPP r7Jm0JyBOOObjFG4QLq8iRb00EXXsTNdj/OyTdzwg/MozUeIDN73jaiSVdnvDTNe4VFr vOtLxY5Z1Jo04wCqk8fyQ2Q6Ar/jsiQcM3AFWWZWVz+hSfkpWAzUvkdCeTdLqZmFqqmE zRAVFCtAMArcZ0OJQUiZiXGn0k7bckkkEvWfpT/Mi/ZHD0B/t7oJfg29OnxnnwUAXYjY +Gww==
X-Received: by 10.49.127.196 with SMTP id ni4mr8884010qeb.5.1371853415876; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cromis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.76.42 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6BCAAC4F-2B45-43BA-A40B-96F3369A5851@tzi.org>
References: <DB211AD8-6BBA-4D95-9B6E-F00AA69E584E@vpnc.org> <6BCAAC4F-2B45-43BA-A40B-96F3369A5851@tzi.org>
From: Jacob Davies <jacob@well.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:23:15 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ovk_1ytyEIP1x_D7JYy1uSx1vCQ
Message-ID: <CAO1wJ5SzsOvj2voaeM83G2FxmEwBSREHP5YtE5T8G-mgoM4jNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5dae98898d1204dfb183fb"
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equality
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:23:41 -0000
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > Do we have consensus what we'll use the name equality for that we just > defined? > That's my question. What is the problem this is seeking to solve again? Because I'm inclined to say 0, especially since keys cannot be guaranteed to be unique (and so no definition of uniqueness needs to be defined for that). It seems like this is dictating the interpretation of data, rather than its format.
- [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equality Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Stephan Beal
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Jim Schaad
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Vinny A
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Norbert Lindenberg
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… R S
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equa… Carsten Bormann