IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (3922)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 19 March 2014 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F271A0753 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ljlxbr_53NSr for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4921A0489 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e16so10522262qcx.34 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oPnRb64Zs7ODXpHPC6kIJ3FGoU7XqZ+kGYYL08CSJBU=; b=njlSxfjhNmJdP2wz1PVOyype5N2vK8UOvk/PVs+su4EAkbfnCJlRgS//iOKPKU7j4W ms0ltUI0s2HX2KiFISEzOaUNtNiAjVd1LsRY+9aiiaZaRXSOaUdNIN5V5nXACfvd6xVh ebw/9dv+RpnlF/hWVLCxh4fo4tNcaWPS+KprL/ylOZot23U1Ml6vD5wo47gJLgkziPbb exB4p1hZ3tT5juRk6RIKyL6UAv7deaYfZ9ZUAvraVs6mERw37CmPjtAczwPMTM2AIIrq DzwMDcGkJQXdjZAd2h/+xZwblyEmwKSIE3tMG4eMbInNMDJxB3NcKETzSEUfVh7jG+ec 527Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.112.5 with SMTP id u5mr45847307qcp.3.1395260636953; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.42.136 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0B49E8C8-3E47-48D8-B45A-D4948DCCE002@vpnc.org>
References: <20140319192235.B26B67FC394@rfc-editor.org> <0B49E8C8-3E47-48D8-B45A-D4948DCCE002@vpnc.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:23:56 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ETg1pLq5ZfCI_QHqJ7cGgplytUA
Message-ID: <CALaySJJ85Q4bAbWDjZ1bOyhsHkP9pvN=TvYaHxoGBSMHnOKrUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11330a74a29cd804f4fb6e37"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/KnjmM0oZ83j6nqslAz2rRD8gP9M
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, "naesten@gmail.com" <naesten@gmail.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "mamille2@cisco.com" <mamille2@cisco.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (3922)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:24:07 -0000

I'd sat this shouldn't be marked "Rejected", but should instead be removed
from the errata system.  What does the RFC Editor think?

Barry

On Wednesday, March 19, 2014, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> Please reject this errata report. There was a conscious decision made by
> the RFC Editor to issue the new RFC; the fact that the reporter doesn't
> like that decision does not warrant an errata.
>
> --Paul Hoffman, JSON WG co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email