Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Wed, 16 October 2013 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE21111E814D for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RuKcrHEzxR5K for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC0111E8138 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1VWUMI-0005OK-DY; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:54:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:54:06 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <20131016165406.GA9701@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <29850F92-23F1-4859-BB5A-BB5F1F20DD38@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <29850F92-23F1-4859-BB5A-BB5F1F20DD38@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Possible next work for the WG
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:54:12 -0000

Paul Hoffman scripsit:

> - I-JSON (a profile of JSON with some interoperability issues nailed down)
> 
> - Best practices document for JSON implementers and folks who use JSON
> in protocols

I think these are both worthy ideas, though perhaps they can be merged.

> - Canonicalization rules so that two JSON texts can be compared for equality

I think we should explore this, but it's going to be tricky.

> - Requirements for JSON schema (which will be needed before the WG
> considers working on an actual schema)

As reinvented wheels are often hexagonal, I think if we are going to
do this we should adopt draft-zyp-json-schema-04 as a base document
for further work.  This has now expired, but is still available at
<https://raw.github.com/fge/json-schema-validator/master/misc/specs/draft-zyp-json-schema-04.txt>.

I note that this draft proposes "application/schema+json" as the media
type for JSON schemas.  That leads me to believe we should make "*/*+json"
official, parallel to "*/*+xml" per RFC 3023.  I'll post on that separately.


-- 
John Cowan      cowan@ccil.org        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?