Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call of draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-04

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

I haven't been following this document terribly closely, but it looks good from what I see.

FWIW, other reviewers may find this useful:
  http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc4627&url2=draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-04

A couple of nits (which may have already been discussed, pardon my ignorance):

* Shouldn't this document obsolete 4627?
* Since this document is so similar to 4627, have you considered leaving Crockford on the author list?
* Is section 1.3 intended to be in the final, published document? If so, it contains a needless amount of detail (e.g., a link to a consensus call, a note that the 'changes' section has been added, WG attribution, adding Tim as editor)
* Appendix.A is supposed to be removed by the RFC Editor, right?

Cheers,


On 27/09/2013, at 3:14 AM, Matt Miller (mamille2) <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello All,
> 
> This message begins the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on "The JSON Data Interchange Format" < draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-04 >.  WGLC will end in two weeks, on October 11.
> 
> Please review the document and send comments to the Working Group mailing list < json at ietf.org > or the co-chairs <json-chairs at tools.ietf.org > before the end of the WGLC.  Note that suggested changes which include proposed text will be more strongly considered than those without.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Paul Hoffman and Matt Miller
> 
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/