[Json] Adrian Farrel's No Objection on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 27 May 2013 04:56 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C086221F8B60; Sun, 26 May 2013 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ji2vrfxFyeT3; Sun, 26 May 2013 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5941221F8B18; Sun, 26 May 2013 21:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.50
Message-ID: <20130527045612.32655.32729.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 21:56:12 -0700
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: [Json] Adrian Farrel's No Objection on charter-ietf-json-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 04:56:12 -0000
Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-json-00-01: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nit... "It makes sense to move RFC 4627 onto the Standards Track." Of course it makes sense, but I don't know that it really needs to said in the charter (are there other parts of the charter that don't make sense ;-)
- [Json] Adrian Farrel's No Objection on charter-ie… Adrian Farrel