IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Kicking Off JSONbis

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 30 September 2015 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A041A0AF8 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aE1MH1zgfpPH for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AD11A066B for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.187.51.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6jIK-1adQo946Fw-00wWsQ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:00:50 +0200
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
References: <DB74C466-D542-42D6-95B0-690A564435A9@cisco.com> <CAHBU6iuoYwK31Kd0qudGvuUUkofc0bYag3hdJBojmHvy6P2HgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Syi3v8jWark294pMGB=HDt9bEco=vCQAvcTmrnxrk0xSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <560B88A1.3010007@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:00:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Syi3v8jWark294pMGB=HDt9bEco=vCQAvcTmrnxrk0xSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Rv+EhWmTp28/Ah/N8zRr1N5rekNe8R8In6y0w14eU5ZVI4kwF4y QsL0YmiB+4OQg+mPgOiy4oeMKX5hP7PygZMRdFQDeK1fQg9hVd+yV6DAxUxNR8GgEvXuARS S20u5EtDZIUrFPObyPvzuUazsRttfgGH85i9V0MxFKEGbB4gs3vKXHypKniINJvWrVAortx KadsEZ6EeDjEjzbjhfY4g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:IfjPTbNYEU0=:3ALnYNYykfNwGQK2d9S5di HLAT0aRVBgle3soKMZxLRJTqs6rDufpY3RqvkMw/oiJVm4cNVL3zqjEnJlaTaPqD8IgIrSSrw toXF09pBcp/EeNQjkPKfmTAfVjc3P0H0xmCDhl7fo4aCiUdrnopMF+hSCvtm8EE3JpFo9XSRM IJsrd8jmHyuusv/fjv8VYmz9yDC53KlOBuucNWofroBVQ6Z8bxCGfTd2cCS+ztB0d+cXw59Pq ztJiwiiip2DdQvuS9VoIZedrxpmKVEGn/aNaKlp1v6ZuvNJ2FiBUAyaTnr3pCQCYwTnHr0D4E u34zDScAUwKqDD1wa05aQQgWsBjYJV7OW4amMPiVfzSTCad8gjOanrA/FbTmFdWMfvdYj4n0X SxBtOxwQ4QBvjlYWpnc9wRe47NlBpTqnf3dlXivpERv94zS1YLPkq5cNXNbt0gxF6yaOsKmVP C9Y76sLolr/JF8kK7zz/aK78XBypxVZVMMMncwBOLv8OtyDW8bBdVlt7Wncqhi48g+0CciV41 uVUM7G0eh4/MTFqyDw12F0R7N428ViSREGTRxwRfEraqghcUgCtG58OoZoGaEQRY9q1mtgUsf fO4kv+BeCUWIxhs+iY1WQAykndOXnO0Gs8WstTvwmHFOyRNB0Dr3481PtuSSJav/MCkNWpEAg BU1qY/56jAjfpjQbaqUWI+77KjKBVLvlg0hs+lZWMLK7WeuuEYtpjZjxJXdc8emUjfjb1ndEp BN1/JIkvFWhv7rwkFBj5C504d1aUvDVwFIJxKaMRc8RSYb/Ut/z4GOe3D4UXEthVyYXYIgsAl onGx7Gc
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/MSf_UF8yci7PTOPCWuiRm9HNGgg>
Cc: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Kicking Off JSONbis
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:00:56 -0000

On 2015-09-30 08:44, Rob Sayre wrote:
 > ...
 > To me, it seems like a political or diplomatic gesture that helps the
 > Internet to move forward.

Right.

 > Framing it in technical or standards-wonk terms seems counterproductive.
 > I don't think there are substantive issues in those areas that would be
 > resolved by objecting to the plan in the charter.
 > ...

But then the charter doesn't mention the suggested change explicitly.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email