Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 2014-03-18 16:30, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Julian Reschke <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-03-18 16:14, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:06 AM, Julian Reschke <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2014-03-17 23:17, Matt Miller wrote:
>>>>> Greetings again.  We earlier asked a couple of questions to gauge what
>>>>> the new proposed WG charter ought to contain.  That feedback has been
>>>>> valuable, but has drilled into implementation specifics before a new
>>>>> charter was actually agreed on!  We have been chastised by our AD about
>>>>> this, and for good reason.  We think we already have enough input from
>>>>> the London meeting and the list over the past few days to make the
>>>>> following proposal for a new charter:
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> What happened to the proposal to add James Snell's json-merge draft to the list of WG items?
>>>
>>> I don't remember that discussion. draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch should still be part of AppsAWG; it just needs someone to take over the work.
>>>
>>> --Paul Hoffman
>>
>> We talked about that after the WG meeting, didn't we?
>
> Errrr, maybe? Your recollection may be better than mine.
>
> Having said that, I'm not sure if this draft needs to move from AppsAWG: it just needs an author to finish the draft.

...and it needs review from people using JSON in protocols -- I *think* 
this is more likely to happen if if moves over to the JSON WG...