Re: [Json] Limitations on number size?

Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com> Wed, 10 July 2013 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sgbeal@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CF521F9F43 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hEmJmHMyz2v6 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE7A21F9CF7 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ld11so6519822pab.36 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dpryv9jYDYnsF7929OpM55ICssGiZRdCe3I/9EHDtOE=; b=Bt8MY67Wrl2oOKIy4SkJwEnXCT9uryhcMGJkJ9NgZ5K6Sln1wHRa59dGu56taSK7Cy n75sBhc7sG8n+VzDh5Afa9e1GBQqth4QG0p2/knkKo61UH87bF7lT5sFw57s/bvTOEQ4 ucNWpCy6TtI7GtnaQV58W7vbxIYWiE0UlxWbjmsblG7tqp2KIB6gcaxHYlhAmSv2eymO r8Ui1AA8zoQNlXg9DbquiGixzFf7pgUujmzcRwPZse8xBaRFemgGmBN0Z6UAtyNCwxYj ilPig34ahY98HO9u50E3tzVhH2IevULYhteUqEjsFVnVriG4mLM9VB0esTyw2eyUbr8t nkPQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.219.130 with SMTP id po2mr30670529pbc.54.1373451871867; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.156.35 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 03:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKd4nAj66kGWvRGTUtwg_238LuiZ47jRLWAaCho2jH69Qu7ZUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51DC0F95.7010407@gmail.com> <hf8ot8hnpa93pi3t54c4d5qcc3p5tnb3ca@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CAK3OfOgTNaLpRthrRcU4Bo+3z1aXUOOn0Ord7RBPN8z6TtiiWw@mail.gmail.com> <51DC7F87.6060503@gmail.com> <CAGrxA24v5L7oCGxEOwecJSLCNiLrSWSt=jFJMA0M9E8fztNLag@mail.gmail.com> <51DC95B2.8080801@gmail.com> <20130709231139.GC8043@gmail.com> <51DCA042.4000303@gmail.com> <CAKd4nAjHE8_4hWMG7jSzv=_VsoKb-cqNdX4CR+6R-p1WkQnDTQ@mail.gmail.com> <51DD3248.3020008@gmail.com> <CAKd4nAj66kGWvRGTUtwg_238LuiZ47jRLWAaCho2jH69Qu7ZUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:24:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKd4nAi6pO21e49UOcw+KQzEmbJ-mzc+4bg8BRBBSc5ZvHv-Tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com>
To: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff24881f05d3304e125ae1c
Subject: Re: [Json] Limitations on number size?
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:24:42 -0000

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com>wrote;wrote:

> You're right, and i'll see if i can find some properly collected
> statistics. My "evidence" is purely anecdotal - 90+% of the applications i
> work with which use JSON are www-based or www-bound.
>

While this doesn't count as evidence, it might help support the anecdote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON

"It [JSON] is used primarily to transmit data between a server and web
application, serving as an alternative to XML."

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal