IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Kicking Off JSONbis

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 14 October 2015 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FB31B2C67 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 01:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xE7-ZCT7cD34 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 01:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B7E1B2C45 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 01:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.59.6.129] ([37.152.95.96]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Likl3-1aIbUM1xyX-00cwre; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:36:08 +0200
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <DB74C466-D542-42D6-95B0-690A564435A9@cisco.com> <CAC4RtVD3cKThDTr_eS-QCUhKqZkMS0y+nPS5HxCk3f1RQ7VyJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iv_w_O95Nq-bU1z2GOKgouuGrMbZP4Uwio25pPtFCc3UQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <561E079D.9090908@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:43:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iv_w_O95Nq-bU1z2GOKgouuGrMbZP4Uwio25pPtFCc3UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:IwlaqS2+rg4pu4zEzf7O735b3D2zABg0uUfzx3EMwqssQ5WqMTR 6nLwNNAZRiuBUgIXC5vG+q8OAZSi+Nd9ERHqcBA+ev9+eFYCSV+3ycFbGAIytvpvqmDA4nN OG9B3Zq47jdDNRhznzPDItRxlgjcz/YrCc5k1P3becoJ2Jq4S87zBQpa2JE742lk9UiK9oX h6GuGpz+XYSthq03BrlBQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:GKTy7Iwi0M0=:O8kAieAuDIY+FDtKkIYkaW ekR6GW9Pa4LEgRUhJjDNZlk3758YS6rVIERmrE5mNm9z34sM0Zq8E1GaufG0nVZDnssi0OnK9 30rBpD/nU/ghjCewCIK/Rviw3xqC1UPPqAQYRWt32veAlW7aSmqRyevudZpZrqFCCVKqcbdIE j/IO7lMUceR4HK5WFGrOd3BaTo2xCtMDxc0qdnpxekuVHifMye9DXpdrnmzTu+zA18QSfgB/G FcL1T2tChtOCZDoUne5iCVv5cVJ+FhWK5SxmNOurU0V9BCKlpi4ya4m4RtclXGn+8ruxEkzLj RM6jOIzLNnSjRPyTPPOQh++ACIgeQ1u1dxxniG2zlxoBOtPZKLwp6KaKoYFkn59vDxQvAS47j dwhLTQmMZMITvG6RQqCf0A9b4XWM7jjfezXJ8PEGvYuGlNdWLYBl5i+6e2Y8kzTsEKEAoZK/q F5/RZP+4UMWp5e6ZnG2m/lAw3C23EHOtK/j5ZZG5Oy7JNctuNrnoE3OZ+2XhDxbxPX5kjRASh c8r7PJHFXZ3oWMj7n7ZJun+fl0XfgyXzmP687V9bahLuZlnkkttuxpqzEssgwU44OAVOWVORH mJyThdW/B6YxUDfbUmjP0OlPWLdN8HT5EKtHtdb84C8eYXkuqZhqspqIfg5qjPChdrqGoWlpA Vm0t5nUY13ZyNGuWCvjMMxLOOuUTn8Et6F2EeaXsPy8954dLevZ3Qna/rFC5gRu61dJZ8e3Rw o9B5OtRiPJBVhC7Q/PQC/ncWCteJ6VLivfJxapr70r+Rss+wg33egitLsj2Bf94UVCKu//DUn wJ0LjOM
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/NVi0bz-3t4nPdJ78Hp8a3OkhqKQ>
Cc: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Kicking Off JSONbis
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:36:15 -0000

On 2015-10-14 06:02, Tim Bray wrote:
> Sure, but isn’t a consensus call on the substantive change to the spec
> in order?

Right. As far as I recall, there was little (or no?) support for the 
reference change. I believe we should discuss it here *before* making a 
change in the draft.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email