IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Fri, 10 May 2019 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16516120177 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S6Mg6O_OP44x for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8606120125 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id s3so7867768itk.1 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hP2nPNrR3zUAe/GwvVR5qM0Xbns3QjGejPS/VgIhp1A=; b=JgbKeIIMITjH+WVzb3ayGC6PHj+ymMWDHSJMoi1o02QXsayjc0mI2tTLFi+gZwCoPT 8255Z9KNW5A3gl2AIxJp/Inn27seX6dRWWM1TvKNbKpLeo3CyvonM1oVjn+5zecNurot 6OVLxvIsTmr7zh13aEiAaint+AUYPs5cnZQkiAM8331mkSBkXSaCXqa0XqynXV/3IYRr 9Ybn8OO1RwShiPDFTxhp2Zt7k7W4CXUKEmV6uvZOlVvl0XXzL0TQQbSUNxLaCTzZaL7p Q0ImN+1g1SPyvTDtwe7r4lQZGcNCPkjizJ5YaJSpFmZlEKG2cfErJqgzc7X6bVVq7lPi RDbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hP2nPNrR3zUAe/GwvVR5qM0Xbns3QjGejPS/VgIhp1A=; b=MOCKmEyb9DlVx0GmyMdGw9vjtLZd6FWZStXAJbo6N5SwUCYV+AvGu264Gi6a3Zt1yo 749bGoS3CmFKXrGSWyVJOB9XfAJy8AE5Wu8gLYTFMzf+xdXm6YfwzOK5X1MaUgu6/5oV TWkgGHD+EUAjjVsAWi+kRz3La3qM8IEsmaO7lg2Rlcrn4VFtwqFhds3e0Kie0VLF64AB z90/IoK9iYF3ZA0Ecgt8QWCzDdlLNxLCDLQzs9X2Fdq8bWSD1+YfyZlAQSShEMOQ/IqF 73ZSBfxVX/WjqsohEC+0lJNPq25m/iqw/RznDq5AiYYnOGvArI1xE1Ip6rPyw8ffB+90 AlEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWT3CnI7Vlu8nbwSY4Ec+M6rpB27kODRHZCSpx9pXFrMepG8UQt lry3Rsz+6hkKjNJduqBFzaic5TSpXYbWm0+6d/k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMJ8a/X3l/Kz4S9BckgSsH6Pf87QaKA39d1phOj3OgPcSmfrwd3e+bxbcZnXfhMyXbcLy8FBqyXa2Qcm/KK5s=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:c347:: with SMTP id s68mr6105417itg.140.1557473583053; Fri, 10 May 2019 00:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJK=1RjV1uv0eOdtFZ8cKn-FfCwCiGP5r2hOz1UamiM6YV4H1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6itE8kub1qtdRoW8BqxaOmzMv=vUo1aDeuAr3HX141NUGg@mail.gmail.com> <77994bdb-a400-be90-5893-b846a8e13899@gmail.com> <20190507154201.GP21049@localhost> <CEF72901-5077-4305-BA68-60624DCE952D@bzfx.net> <69ea0c99-e983-5972-c0aa-824ddeecb7c4@dret.net> <CAMm+LwjyVjnJuWE4+a9Ea=_X1uuEGuK+O4KojzN3uVQ+s+HqUQ@mail.gmail.com> <058f58a3-dd27-998e-5f54-4874aff5f2f0@dret.net> <20190507221726.GR21049@localhost> <CAJK=1Rj7PBD-bbwvsqgjQQzp4Aoidb-W2q5Lj6asMHHDHaTVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJK=1Rj7PBD-bbwvsqgjQQzp4Aoidb-W2q5Lj6asMHHDHaTVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 00:32:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sy378qT21Dyt2OYw8cYbX8k_CZmk7h=9_4er9GoDwTPzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>, Austin Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000aa4261058883930a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/NsS4ubMx_M9LN6LWN3dMUylFFA4>
Subject: Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:33:05 -0000

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:57 PM Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to offer a summary of what has been stated thus far, so as to
> make a bit more sense of the conversation.


I think there's no need to do this work. I know, because I replaced a large
JSON-based analytics provider with a protobuf-based system that was cheaper
with better correctness, and was an implementation detail of a product
doing other things.

- Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email