IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #1: Media Types?

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Mon, 28 April 2014 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0571A6F54 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QiSOwx1VJ0Ad for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5671A03FC for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id im17so9016465vcb.0 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=t5+iUtuXG6cjTj9+fHNjfYsIUnw9QbappFVgLHZSGv4=; b=iVIYgnwywGvIS2v4q4iSJ1DN0TmSl37+Zftdp9nZtXGa+IMeOe7p8dmlvL6brk6a3z s0ZjnJ1NvEHP/nGvQHKTV3sFCADVsmmu0bJAWjV/GVR8pAGesSeIcmyRqt10yoVCBUF3 /6XXXSlGJQM1/HXUJsnhDGkj3dBP2ol4Mgr/jjzkVtBicfhGp0kJAVKsjseSw64d5T+H qiOATqKghSKMYg1yEDXJCQqgH4scsqASY1+1OEvAwbwsUJB6MtOutN04LaP8yHYC/mkh YHZwyUtZ6NBUAuX45H3o532ft+b4VTOxxzNys4pnEjoS4szB7l7kPO39HFSBCKhjhFsi Barg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQniZqZjxUHCPaPnhVzP+oH/t7vTxV+1UVuKpwqwmC8MgBFbr4oiyD6RR/sokALqBdYpoiNY
X-Received: by 10.58.207.74 with SMTP id lu10mr25085248vec.15.1398716237172; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.98.73 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [96.49.81.176]
In-Reply-To: <535EAFDF.2020403@cisco.com>
References: <535EAFDF.2020403@cisco.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:16:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6is6KL4BnoYQqtaB-q4rh1bQb5XYTj0hT0PefhAjWzx-hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6783ce756d4f04f820005f"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/ORTSneZsYA0OH57AX8NgoTag10s
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #1: Media Types?
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:17:20 -0000

Having thought some more about this, I can’t actually imagine a scenario in
which the media type (or suffix) would add value. I say lose it from the
draft.


On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> "Should there be an I-JSON media type, or a application/*+i-json
> suffix?  Draft i-json-01 calls for it, but this is at best controversial."
>
> If you are in favor -- or not -- of an I-JSON media type or media type
> suffice, please respond to this thread with your reasoning.
>
>
> - --
> - - m&m
>
> Matt Miller < mamille2@cisco.com >
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>
> * "How to Argue about I-JSON" <
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/current/msg02775.html >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTXq/fAAoJEDWi+S0W7cO1n9cH/0MGVK3lZn5c1C65Wpoa6jhK
> U7vfd7EUC8+W9T8qn3sR16A1MnGSnUvrSw1M4krYwjZfVTiMyEUBpuD8IGcPPj7B
> +7dM2WTk1GgJOwAjpBSmRksbfC+W4rzoZO/XTdz4FvgDNHZ+4MuK9P1wcXRY0ahy
> IpEky0RVv3osXLkGraUVos6DGVV9op6vR6uZw8wH9RuLSVzoVjGlQ56RkigmSA3O
> OjfK9Xo5cHmahHMvuyPXDldyfKWFlfYtA//4z8dRHF42KkoDv6Qv3LtsGSNQoTzq
> l0IOyb3e8eqDO6C9mqlLceniiZbFrxbUL4c2fxvt6FI1pGZbNe5grUVbtEVdI10=
> =JG8k
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email