Re: [Json] Proposal: the minimal edit

[Norbert Lindenberg <[e-mail]>]

On Jun 24, 2013, at 16:42 , Paul Hoffman wrote:

> On Jun 24, 2013, at 4:35 PM, John Cowan <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Tim Bray scripsit:
>> 
>>> In general I’d support this, with one nit: s/that are not Unicode
>>> characters/that can never be Unicode characters/ (just to make it clear
>>> we’re not talking about unassigned code points, which don't seem to
>>> distress anyone).
>> 
>> Well, that excludes not only surrogate code points, which are the really
>> dangerous ones (because they have no standard representation) but non-character
>> code points as well, which shouldn't be interchanged but aren't actually
>> dangerous.  I don't know if you mean to do that or not.
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by "exclude". The sentence Tim was referring to is about inclusion:
> 
>  - ECMAScript implementations can generate and consume code points in JSON strings that are not
>    Unicode characters.

Which definition of "Unicode character" are the three of you referring to?

Thanks,
Norbert