Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-01-01: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 02 April 2014 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174EB1A03C3; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bBkvG0n0gp0G; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3611A039C; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c9so826462qcz.30 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q/qBOmVLdOZIMxhyc7jA2bMQ1qXbnTEyqImvnwEsaOw=; b=Gfk+n0YbzbDuS55tujcZmQWCXKh8C3v3Gal3oZqNwzU1PEjWO81ftR63gimm44Egrb Nyjd2RyiGyXHWoj4xYWPf2h/jXKW2W7a3+u4OoHnOwmA67SAxPecvMa/JoDDhnYzMWm0 rKh8ez9/G4V1g4B2Nm8obWEapvVSYvxGRp70vNuaJoDCgxrxmQQ8AqsEdIztVWkbA8Uh DNDrA6R7Zfp9179zLHBd9VGDah2psDFzVPhbMPSqx+7dPOdDhSW+ZsLSXPPtgn6yGihH z6aMap96z7LDJmRnaIdYJa70clPdPNsxLxuNJpfkcI4p4EFFCHX0oQrWTY90wIhnPLv7 /UGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.93.22 with SMTP id c22mr2802623qge.53.1396469812513; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.136.134 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140402201319.14893.23931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20140402201319.14893.23931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:16:52 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: CjLY40N8No_FuDRidy8meOzS6uE
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+hdci3cqOJ-EFXVoJAqk2Ygr+4ZLxT5nOWC=zwe6nURA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/Or3FPegnfu044BYzRk44aUU6uGg
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-01-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:17:02 -0000

> I am ambivalent about external review. On the one hand, these activities
> are really IETF internal. On the other, we've been trying to develop a
> liaison relationship with Ecma. Input on this question welcome.

Given what's happened with Ecma and what we're trying to make happen,
I think it would be a mistake not to loop them in.  On the other hand:
are they even on new-work?  External review won't be sufficient -- an
explicit message to Ecma inviting their review would be needed.

Barry