Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus on Whether or Not to Adopt Nomenclature Document(s) in the Charter

[Stefan Drees <[e-mail]>]

On 2014-03-15 00:22 +01:00, Matt Miller wrote:
> The chairs are seeking comment on whether or not the WG wants to adopt
> one or more nomenclature / schema / description documents in the WG
> charter. A few such documents have been brought to the WG, but our
> initial take is that the WG doesn't want to make any of them WG
> documents. They could proceed towards becoming RFCs without any
> interaction from the WG, depending on the wishes of the ADs and/or the
> Independent Stream Editor. Once a nomenclature document is an RFC, other
> RFCs could use it to describe the JSON in those later RFCs.
>
> Please speak up whether or not you believe our charter should be amended
> to include a work item that would adopt one or more nomenclature /
> schema / description documents.

+0 on opening up for inclusion. I think discussion / inspection of 
additional examples (besides RFC 6962) would help guide us to a 
well-informed consensus in that regard.

>
> --Paul Hoffman and Matt Miller

"All the best,
Stefan"