Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 21 June 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E720721F9BC1 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YgCZCyPuREp3 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDC821F99BE for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5LI6Ae5006106 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:06:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.135] (p5489351C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.53.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 712DE76C3; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:06:10 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <90B659B8-D4AC-41AF-8C06-67FC65C8BD74@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:06:09 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D47C1811-6A88-41AF-84E9-75E54D5D9E08@tzi.org>
References: <90B659B8-D4AC-41AF-8C06-67FC65C8BD74@vpnc.org>
To: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: document title
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:06:25 -0000

1 is preferable;
2 is OK in a pinch.
(0 is wrong and thus I'm not listing it :-)

Grüße, Carsten