Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers
Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> Mon, 19 May 2014 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96A71A03BD for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 12:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h_8TrZj1Guvr for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 12:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEAB1A03DC for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 12:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1444; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1400527841; x=1401737441; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y2Gl6Z6X476b/vQUh2kj3WU0dO81bCUuRi/CdHy15NQ=; b=L+eNJb4L59rM2onFdkvXvW/h+LZ+6cZgUXTdcKOX2FOiwKfH8ilj4r0O MGnLLBfKiLBi9Z3E2tSfZepxSagYXNBtqASJcSVWG+EbRILicUkRjkf4x T3vZz6ml3vnRtIfoqRl5qZpAsiBydiT1eR0L6GCNg9S9G9LOdz9XvIE5n I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsoKAJ5aelOtJA2F/2dsb2JhbABZgwZRWKlSAQEBAQEBBQGaKwEldBZ0gh0IAQEBBHgBEAsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMBBQIBAYVygkvSSBeFVYhIMweDBIE8AQOJWzqPRZMag1aCEQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,868,1392163200"; d="scan'208";a="45223371"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2014 19:30:41 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4JJUftE018256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 19:30:41 GMT
Received: from MAMILLE2-M-T03K.CISCO.COM (10.129.24.57) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (173.37.183.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 19 May 2014 14:30:40 -0500
Message-ID: <537A5BE0.3020406@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 13:30:40 -0600
From: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
References: <535EB3BF.8080606@cisco.com> <CAHBU6ivjF9ULW0yGSVdJi2D6QgUThuhym_ZhpgLM=cvLu=mAiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CF841AAE.47D86%jhildebr@cisco.com> <CAHBU6itK5HtSTPWSsHsHUPja90emqU86LsgjrBorkqcUDivS2A@mail.gmail.com> <CF87EB9C.48BB0%jhildebr@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF87EB9C.48BB0%jhildebr@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.129.24.57]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/PqWhMkA0Am-p2qvSY0kcd5tJESg
Subject: Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:30:45 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 5/1/14, 12:19 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote: > Subnormals are allowed in JSON, I believe. They probably don't > interop quite as expected if you're using C and have -O1 or higher > turned on (for example). > > On 4/28/14, 3:11 PM, "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com> wrote: > >> Well, they?re disallowed in JSON let alone i-json so I?d have >> hoped we can ignore them. >> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) >> <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote: >> >> Will we need to talk about subnormals, -0, NaN, Infinity, and the >> like? > Hello Joe, could you provide more detail of what the concern here is? I suspect you have been too terse so far. - -- - - m&m Matt Miller < mamille2@cisco.com > Cisco Systems, Inc. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTelvgAAoJEDWi+S0W7cO1o38H/0HTEaeT7r5wW/UrADj+ohRo Bev8XHnVwXpCy+2VACVaZ7pQBanYbfQcH1BJNDaOTlHVM+/qhoEP2YNht9i0Fism NNTAUuIf5zt/II/zWnTN1hZDY74RgoIl50GOmcyrbYF+fN1Lf4Cg6J7mLi0ZL5Kz /s5WjG7igJrHLOzLUlUnMpNLX5WktGNqLaTsmAYYoMvRQnMDuuJvOJZpyAo52KU1 ReMqp6Sb9oE9ypMlHUrMdbw/6QltwzC8vTl91KvO0Nat8wu2EAHvWxN71AhXcnqN TBznNQa2vyfVmlXAOkOxYCr2EOr750BQ/+iSTv/pZTljmHiSRkU6v245+YgNUkY= =/KNl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Matt Miller
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Jacob Davies
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Stefan Drees
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Matt Miller
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Manger, James
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Manger, James
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Matt Miller
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Matt Miller
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Manger, James
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers John Cowan
- Re: [Json] I-JSON Topic #5: Numbers Carsten Bormann