Re: [Json] Status of 7159bis

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 07 January 2017 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70AE129581 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:50:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ev5ph8S-cIU for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:50:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88DE8129580 for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:50:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-51-163.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v07GnsWp063827 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Jan 2017 09:49:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-163.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.163] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 08:50:47 -0800
Message-ID: <31BC7F44-3C45-45EE-8F6D-B0016C7FFF97@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7f687476-a694-0f7d-2e2f-84d23a9ea430@gmx.de>
References: <7f687476-a694-0f7d-2e2f-84d23a9ea430@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5319)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/PzfidPH7rAcwwmUFxwkN0kJGqiw>
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Status of 7159bis
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:50:50 -0000

On 7 Jan 2017, at 7:35, Julian Reschke wrote:

> I just noticed that the document went to state "Publication Requested" 
> early December, with no notification of the working group

Julian is correct here, and that's a bit disturbing.

> , and (IMHO) some of the few feedback that the document received 
> during WG LC being ignored (such as 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/current/msg03945.html> and 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/current/msg03978.html>).
>
> What's going on here?

I cannot tell. I'm one of the mailing list moderators, and I didn't see 
any message to the list or in the moderator queue. This seems like a 
problem with the IETF tooling.

--Paul Hoffman